Published 2-26-2015 by John J. Nowak last edited 11/18/2017
  
Global Secular State Religion Gate 

Unconstitutional Government
Funded Indoctrination of Tens of Millions of
Impressionable Youthful  Students

Please take a moment and sign petition, our nation's survival is at stake.
https://www.change.org/p/new-york-times-sglobal-secular-state-religion-gate-within-the-massive-government-academia-establishment-1800-universities-and-colleges


Fact I: We The People (U.S. Constitution) are slowly losing our constituional empowerment to an unconstitutional government funded Global (one world government) Secular State Religion G.S.S.R..

Fact II: The first settlers came to America for freedom from State Religion and its persecution. In 1791 our founding fathers enacted into law the cornerstone "Establishment Clause" of the US constitution, "Congress shall make no law RESPECTING an establishment of religion..."which includes an establishment of a secular religion. Courts had defined a Secular religion:

  1. (1957) "... first place there are forms of belief... accepted as religions and whose adherents, numbering in the millions,...do not include or require as essential the belief in a deity. Taoism, classic Buddhism, and Confucianism, are among these religions" Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda,  153 Cal. App. 2d 673, 315 P.2d 394.
  2. (1961) "Among religions in this country which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism, and others" US supreme Court Torcaso v. Watkins (367 U.S. 488).
  3. (1965-1970) Particular elements of a secular relgion, U.S. v Seeqer U.S. 162, 176 , Welsh v. U.S.398 U.S. 333 (1970):
  1. "training and belief"
  2. "...a sincere and meaningful belief occupying in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God"

Fact III: Since then our Government left of the charted course of our founding fathers and went back to a State religion, particularly a "SECULAR" State religion.

Fact IV: The G.S.S.R. consist of atheistic, Infidel (ancient Greek anti Judeo - Christian) philosophy tenets that morphed through the ages, were re-branded to hide their origins, their chaos and rumination to past civilizations and to sound more appealing to deceive youthful impressionable students, combined with the G.S.S.R. in the administration of government academia (1800 universities and colleges) for decades have discriminated, in preferably awarding tenure to atheistic, Infidel (ancient Greek anti Judeo - Christian) philosophy following professors, have in effect rigged the deck, resulted in the persecution of Christians.

  1. (423 BC - early 1800's) History of Atheistic, Infidel (anti-judeo Christian) Philosophy (so called wisdom) http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#History_of_Infidel_Philosophy
  1. (Early 1800's to mid 1800's) Infidel Philosophy morphed into being called "sociology" - based on atheistic world view, promoters of sexual immorality/perversions, observation of a very short segment of time human behavior, social interactions, and between nations, faddish and bias against traditional religion http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#1840s_atheistic_Infidel_Philosophy
  2. (1859) Infidel philosophymorphed into being called "evolution" - no creator, even racism- based on atheistic world view http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#1859_Infidel_Philosophy_Darwins
  3. (1879) Infidel Philosophy morphed into being called "psychology" - based on atheistic world view, man's discernment, mental disposition, atheistic world view, observation of a very short segment of time, faddish and bias against traditional religion  http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#1879_Infidel_philosophy_psychology
  4. (1930 - 1950's) Infidel Philosophy morphed into being called "psychiatry" - based on atheistic world view, their solution, remedy is drugs where they enrich themselves, based on the provable false theory of “chemical imbalance”, fraud. http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#1950s_Infidel_Philosophy_psychiatry
  1. (1991) Government Universities Preferred Hiring, Awarding Tenure to Liberal Professors, Overall Leftest Bias Dominate - Hans Tirpak, Director, Law Student Bar Association, university of Buffalo, Amherst "...colleges and universities have been and are in the practice of hiring and awarding tenure to liberal professors over equally qualified conservative professors,..", “...the growing awareness that most of America’s colleges and universities, including UB (university of Buffalo), have become dominated by leftist professors and administrators strongly support the inference.", "It might be stretching things a bit to assert that UB and/or similarly situation colleges or  universities do not hire conservative professors. I hear UB has some in it’s political science department. I even met one about a year ago. I was quite surprised. With that exception, every professor I have met at UB in the 2 1/2 years I’ve been a student has seemed leftist" Buffalo Newspaper.
  2. (2012) The Washington Times- Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement - 80 percent of psychology professors at elite and non-elite universities are Democrats, 90 percent identified as liberal http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/1/liberal-majority-on-campus-yes-were-biased/
  3. (2013) University campus is akin to something between a big church or a small Vatican -  Why many professors are atheists: Academe as a secular religious community https://deathbytrolley.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/why-many-career-academics-are-atheists-academe-as-asecular-religious-community/
  4. (2014) Inside Higher ED - Retaliation Claim Vindicated "Seven years after Mike Adams sued the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, charging that he was denied a promotion because of his political views, a federal jury agreed" https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/03/21/jury-backs-claim-conservative-professor-he-was-denied-promotion-because-his-views
  5. (2015) Exposed: Christian Students Rejected, Failed, and Expelled for their Faith by State Universities- RED STATE https://www.redstate.com/matthewclark/2015/07/13/exposed-christian-students-rejected-failed-expelled-faith-state-colleges-universities/
  6. (2016) Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/6/liberal-professors-outnumber-conservatives-12-1/
  7. (2016) Lawyers, Psychologists, Social Workers - The Secular Priests of Family Court Tyranny https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-young/lawyers-psychologists-social-workers-the-secular-priests-of-family-court-tyranny/10154027427912458/

Fact V: The G.S.S.R. within government academia (1800 universities and colleges) massive logistics as if mutiple vaticans in every State, wielding their power and influence unconstitutionally replaced our nation's Judeo-Christian secular principled heritage with:

  • "Evolution" no creator, based on atheistic world view, bias
  • "Sociology" an atheistic world view, promoters of sexual immorality/perversions, observation of a very short segment of time human behavior, social interactions, faddish and bias against traditional religion
  • "Psychology" man's discernment, mental disposition, atheistic world view, observation of a very short segment of time, faddish and bias against traditional religion
  • "Psychiatry" their solution, remedy is drugs where they enrich themselves, based on the provable false theory of “chemical imbalance”, fraud.
Compared to the nations founding documents supportive of our nation's judeo-Christain secular principled heritage, consisting of four elements found in the library of sixty six books, over forty authors referred to as the bible:
  • "Creation" a creator in the book of genesis, our founding fathers gave homage and their trust four times to the creator, beginning with the Declaration of Independence in these words “nature's God”, “creator”, “supreme judge of the world”,  and “with a firm reliance on the PROTECTION of Divine Providence”
  • "Morals", multiple observers for thousands of years, detailed universal principles of moral human behavior created into laws, rights, versus evil.
  • "Spirit" (Spiritual and Spiritually), mental disposition, discernment, frame of mind, logic, train of thought, both secular and supernatural
  • "Wisdom, insight", remedies/solutions that empowers one to overcome immoral behavior, brings inner peace, and long life

I. Affirmatives:

A.) It is unconstitutional to use tax payer funds in the billions for "RESPECTING" atheistic, infidel (anti-judeo Christian) Philosophy (so called wisdom) tenets under the titles of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry establishments.
  1. Government cannot "MAKE LAW" that "FUNDS", give the status as "EXPERTS", status as "FACTS" and promote a "VERNACULAR, RULES, REGULATIONS and PROCEDURAL" under the titles of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry establishments, is a form of "RESPECTING", marginalizes particularly religious establishments who also have much secular wisdom in human behavior, mental disposition, studies, remedies, vernacular, rules and their particular concept of the origin of man with God at its center.

B.) It is a violation of the Establishment Clause when the administration of massive government academia (1800 universities and colleges) gave tenure more so to fellow bias professor adherents of atheistic, infidel (anti-judeo Christian) Philosophy (so called wisdom) tenets, stacked and rigged the deck, created bias/fraudulent/fake science or Pseudo (meaning false, sham) science in Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry, resulted in a sincere and meaningful belief occupying in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God, a secular State religion.


II: Proposed Amendment 28 to the U.S. Constituion:


Secular religions shall be removed from all Government http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#Amendment_28:_Secular_religions_shall_be

An amendment to the constitution is in order, if not according to the constitutional provision through Congress then convening a constitutional convention to inscribe as if in stone as much as possible an unmovable supreme law of the land, Amendment 28 Secular religions shall be removed from all Government.

Section One: Secular religions shall be removed from all Government.

Section Two: Religion to be officially recognized by the United States government as a human behavioral group with having a belief in God or a substitute in a sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God. Such as may exist in a person/possessor a “sense of things as in true, correct” that equates in similar regard as a “Supreme Being as in true, correct” outside of a traditional religion, still amounts to religion.

Section Three: The "Theory of Evolution" and the theory of "Intelligent Design" will  only be allowed to be taught by any non government group on the outside of government through private means/funding only, be allowed access to government funded academia and public schools K-12 to present a case for either. There will be no more government grants for either teaching, or research on the "Theory of Evolution", which would also exclude the theory of "Intelligent Design".

Section Four: Psychology, Psychiatry, Sociology and Philosophy (infidel philosophy) to be officially recognized by the United States government, as human behavior groups, secular religions. 

Section Five: Government shall make no law respecting an establishment of Psychology, Psychiatry, Sociology and Philosophy (infidel philosophy), or prohibiting free exercise of.  Government will neither promote or establish psychologists, psychiatrist instead promote and establish social workers for feeding, sheltering, clothing, giving medical care, and stabilizing the emotional disturbed from harming themselves. Most rarest, special circumstances, such as if someone dangers themselves or others, a group of people employed by the state, will be given the most minimal task, of stabilization, without drugs or counseling. 

Section Six: Constitutional rights of the stabilized emotional disturbed, to choose from a list of groups for their counseling. Equal access to the stabilized emotional disturbed, by all law abiding groups outside of government, either philosophy, psychology (non-traditional religion), or traditional religion and morality. 

Section Seven: All influences, counseling will be given strictly to groups who are private funding only, religious or secular. All human behavior groups, establishments non-traditional secular religion, or traditional religion will only be on the outside of government, who fairly complete for private funding, the trust of the People, by the People only. 

Section Eight: All law abiding groups non-traditional secular religion, or traditional religion can submit their name of their group and what they offer counseling, fellowship, daily living needs, as examples, on a list, which would be given to anyone who goes through the courts, jails, hospitals, schools, all state institutions of our nation. Which allows any individual to choose from the list for his or her counseling “private funded only”. No longer will people as in years past, be at the mercy of government employees, to insure their government jobs: 

Section Nine: All providence would be private funding only, be left to the people to decide with their donations alone, to a human behavior group of their choosing, this solely to decide which type and the extant of a human behavior group’s reach, providing counseling, fellowship, daily living needs, prescription drugs, as examples would be offered. The empowerment will return to the people as it was originally designed in the constitution. The people will determine, dependent upon what they observe in their society, if they will allow such use of drugs or limitation of such drugs.

Section Ten: The category of prescription drugs, psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, to be voted upon by the people in each state, if to be prohibited to anyone under the age of 12 years old, under the age of 18 years old. If enough qualified signatures on a petition, placed on a balled to be voted to prohibited all together. Voted upon by the people in each state, if to be prohibited to anyone in jail.

  1. If not prohibited all together, only voluntarily and with the permission of all three below, will be permitted to receive a psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, for the maximum of three months:

  1. A judge elected by the people every four years, anyone of the jurisdiction can be a candidate, if be for, against, or the limitation of granting and prohibiting specific psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, presented before the electorate. The judge will decided each case of his or her jurisdiction only, presented before his or her court. The person who will take the psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, must be present in front of the judge. The Judge cannot force anyone to take psychiatric drugs, antidepressants. 

  2. Medical doctor

  3. Human behavior group of one’s choosing. 

  1. All three permissions from a judge, medical doctor and a human behavior group of one’s choosing, to renew the prescription up to one year maximum usage of the prescription. Every year must go through same renewal process, including their presence before the judge.

  2. If the judge determines will end the prescription, there will be provided a gradual lower dosage for weaning off the drugs that are addictive.

  3. The people must retain a control, in voting for which judge to serve for four years, in granting or prohibiting psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, use.

Section Eleven: Break up the monopoly colossal government primary education (bias towards Infidelism morphed) establishment into three parts - Our Nation has a New Enemy Within Army of Disciples in Philosophy (Infidelism) 5-17-2010) :

  1. One third state education

  2. One third supported by vouchers private education

  3. One third who home school their children (supported by a smaller percentage of money provided for mothers).

Section Twelve: The government schools, lock, trust, monopoly on education, absolutely will be broken up, through vouchers (100 percentage amount of government school pays for per pupil), where the money follows to the child:

  1. Parents to choose the particular institutions of government or a private institution that has a particular human behavioral persuasion of the parents choosing. 

  2. Private schools will receive government funds per student, parents choosing. They must meet standards of safety, be law abiding and minim hours per subject. As to religious instructions, being they are a private institutions of the people, are exempt from restrictions from teaching tenets of their human behavior group, be it consisting of a God or not. Example such as any human behavior group, Christianity, Muslim, philosophy, psychology, atheism, etc. 

  3. Private schools must be law abiding, violations of laws will loose their prevision to student's funds from government. With the principle of equality to all human behavior groups, allows then public funds be used strictly according to the parent's sole choice of school. 

  4. All public school, will hand out diplomas at 10 grade, 16 years of age. Where some young men and woman will move on to marriage, not being hampered by not receiving a diploma, young woman will begin families, instead of murdering their babies in abortion. Young men will work to support their family. 

  5. Their will be optional two grades for occupational studies, especially for them who do not marry. 

  6. School with grades 9 to 12, will become open to other human behavior groups to use as facilities, consequently will then minus the among of pupil percentage government funds that follows the student, equal to upkeep of the facilities. To keep order and peace in the facilities, all apostatizing, converting, would be excluded from the halls, except for a standardized bill board beside each doorway, what is offered in the room. Their will be limits to volume of sound coming form the rooms. 

  7. Facilities from 9 to 12 grades, will one hour after the regular classes, will be open to all human behavior groups of the local district, all ages, all citizens, for multiple use facilities, with a small fee required to rent rooms, hall, or gym for the expenses of the facilities to operate. All government facilities for 8 grade or lower, will be restricted from other groups use and after hours facility use, for safety concerns, unless voted individually in each local district, the amount of facility availability, as long as equal to all.

  8. Government must also encourage home schooling, such as an amount of money would be giving to the mothers to home school. 

  9. Half the money that would be normally used by government schools per pupil, as an incentive for homeschooling. 

  10. 50 percent of the full amount, due to more expenses when having children leave home for a school, the added cost of buildings and so the mother aren't only interested in the money. This to encourage mothers and make it more easier for them to remain home. Where mothers and fathers training their own children is the idea setting over any other setting imagined by man or government bureaucracy. For mothers and fathers to care, nurture and teach their children in the ways of their choosing of a particular human behavior group, and in the ways of good citizenship. 

  11. To safe guard from abuses, from age of 5 to 11, every six months monitoring through standardized test, and 12 years old to 15 years old, quarterly monitoring through government standardize test would be administered in the government school, for the basics reading, writing, math, history. Supervised by a government official, If not pass, then the child has to to be either sent to public school, or a private school. 

  12. To protect home schooling from abuse and not to encourage an over abundance of having children, for financial gain only, each child addition, would receive one half of financial support, each child's before them. For example say the first child receive 7,000, second would receive 3500, third child would receive 1750, forth child and beyond will receive a minim of 1750. 

  13. As to discourage adultery, for any children born out of the marriage with another woman, will not be eligible to receive financial support, for home schooling, will only be eligible for private schooling or public schooling. 

  14. Any child born in the marriage, by another man, then her husband, will also not be eligible for financial support for home schooling for the particular child.

  15. Either parent convicted of felon, will be not be eligible for seven years to receive financial support, for home schooling.

Section Thirteen: PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES:

  1. All Physical world Philosophy associates itself with particularly rudiments/elements/properties of nature, the physical world around us, can be still be studied and only used in their respective science class rooms.

  2. All Human Behavior Philosophy (infidel philosophy) and it's offspring Psychology, Sociology and Psychiatry departments, must all cease and desist their operations, be removed from all State institutions. Where no so called teacher/professor, student/disciple in these can received any tuition funds of the public institution, government subsidies of government student aid, and pensions must be ended. Why because its a violation of the Establishment Clause.

  3. All political Philosophy such as Political (so called) science departments being they have human behavior philosophy at their center, if not closed should be very much scrutinized and some compromise may be a more appropriate solution.

  4. All the above philosophies, would still be allowed access to particularly public higher education institutions approx 2,000 public universities and colleges.

  5. Traditional or non-traditional religion will each be offered the same respect and allowances, where they can rent a room in a public institution as a club, and be treated the same, no less and no more then any other club, traditional religion or non-traditional religion. I propose they can also be offered to use for hourly periods of time rooms and halls free of charge on the campus, with the State institution's guidelines of total impartiality shown towards all groups.

Section Fourteen: PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES USE OF CLASSROOMS AND HALLS:

  1. Classrooms and halls, are to be used by either a non traditional or traditional religion by appointment only, appointed hourly time limits, the group must be law abiding, sound levels must be under certain limits, absolutely no request for money while in the free classroom or hall, when the classroom or hall is occupied their proselytizing is limited to the inside the classroom or hall. In the hall way proselytizing is limited to only a simple sign, what the group offers can be easily slid the information in a standard adapter on the outside of the room near the side of the door, when the room would soon be occupied, for anyone to read. No leader, teacher or however one is called by the group, can receive any of the institution's tuition from the students or government subsidies for students.

  2. Each group, secular religion or tradition religion, only source of funds will be solely by private means off campus, such as directing anyone to a groups website, and/or in a rented groups room on campus where request for donations is allowed to occur.


Mockers of the truth

Expect there be mockers of the truth, for they use mockery/ridicule/personal attacks as their weapon of choice. Timothy Dwight President 1795-1817 of Yale combating followers of atheistic, infidelism (anti-Christian regurgitated, morphed ancient Greek philosophy) in his day replied "The cause which needs these weapons cannot be just; the doctrine which cannot be supported without them must be false.”, "He warned them against the bias of the world toward infidelity."

Prayer

Please fervently pray that God saves us from the State unconstitutionally respecting a Secular Religion in "Sociology, Evolution, Psychology and Psychiatry" and its scourge of the country. It is up to individuals to place the spot light upon this major issue of our times, informing friends, family, churches and organizations, to petition our government representatives to restore the primary core principle of our nation "Congress shall not make law respecting an establishment of religion" even a secular religion, to make our nation great again.


Index:

Section I

  1. Fact: Beginning in 1991 to 2010 I tried my best and wrote a series of letters to Congress to the best of my ability on the human behavior group neutrality argument, special interest and secular religion argument, to warn America, some excerpts from the letters
  2. (1600's to 1850's) Judeo-Christian Principled Heritage Base of our Constitution and Government
  3. Detail study of the Establishment Clause, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution regarding a Secular Religion

Section II

  1. History of Infidel Philosophy (anti-Christian regurgitated, morphed ancient Greek philosophy)
  2. 1840's Infidel Philosophy morphed into being called sociology, free divorce, utoptian socialist-socialism, free divorce, feminism, complex marriage, free love - based on Atheistic world view,1966 Free love taught/lectured at the Univerity of California, Berkley with university approval.
  3. 1859 Infidel Philosophy evolution - racism- based on atheistic world view
  4. 1879 Infidel Philosophy psychology - based on atheistic world view 
  5. 1930- 1950's Infidel Philosophy psychiatry - based on atheistic world view

Section III

  1. 1978, 12 years old John Jerome Nowak's observations and conclusions of marriage
  2. The historical biblical concept of "One Flesh Marriage" Beginning at 18 years old I began researching the bible to determine what I thought at 12 years old can be verifiable, these are the facts I found.
  3. Diminished comprehension and practiceThe historical biblical concept of  "One Flesh Marriage", due to the so called Catholic group and other religious groups placing stumbling blocks/barriers in the minds of their subjects down through the centuries:
  4. (Early 1900's) Morphed-Infidelism taken over a number of protestant institutions, churches, colleges and seminaries using the "inclusivist strategy":
  5. (Early 1970's onward) State Secular Religion of Morphed-Infidelism attacked the concept of "one Flesh Marriage",  a substantial controlling effect in the premeditated murder of over 60,000,000 CGHL/babies/future citizen:

Section IV

Summary


Section I



Fact: Beginning in 1991 to 2010 I tried my best and wrote a series of letters to Congress to the best of my ability on the human behavior group neutrality argument, special interest and secular religion argument, to warn America, some excerpts from the letters:

  1. 1991 Fact: "Our Nation the Untied States of America was constituted on the principle that our government must not fund, give official recognition of expertise, power of enforcement to any human behavioral group. This separation allows a fair selection by the majority of people to elect a representative, to govern with his principles from his human behavioral group or groups for a term of years." -Human Behavior Groups the Beginning of the End of our Constitution (1991) John Nowak-
  2. 1992 Fact: Special Interest Group majority members have special interest in three similarities: 1) college education 2) middle to upper income 3) refusal to give recognition and censors logic in people and books of other religions. Special Interest Group is propped up through government: 1) Funding 2) recognition of logic into a standard of laws for judging individuals and groups 3) power and prominence to intimidate and enforce their laws of logic. Special Interest Group is masquerading behind Psychology, Sociology, and philosophy (infidel philosophy), using special state powers and prominence to assist in: 1) indoctrination 2) drastic logic and behavior affect in individuals, families, jobs, entertainment and News media. 3) drastic logic and behavior affect in election, laws and enforcement. Special interest group branched out into government agencies after World War II. -Call For the Separation of Special Interest Group and State 1992 John Nowak-
  3. 1993 Fact: The people’s afflictions, trials, and observations bears me somber heartfelt reflection. My countrymen paths have been redirected unconstitutionally. The use of perceived notions of scientific credibility and the unconstitutional accompanying powers inside of government has allowed psychologists to generate an unwarranted suspicion across our country. The psychologist uses personnel experience, perceived sociological knowledge, and non-credible experiments to create human relation value polices, programs, and individual counseling. Supreme court has stated (Supreme Court judge commented) “among religions in this country which do not teach… a belief in the existence of God…(are) Buddhism, ethical culture, secular humanism, and others.” See Torcaso v. Watkin 367 U.S. 488.495n 11.  I John Nowak, a citizen of the United States of America contend Psychology is a secular religion. - Scientific Incredibility Secular Psychology a Religion 1993 John Nowak-
  4. 1995 Fact: "The government has subverted (traditional) religion and morality for about two generations through philosophy (infidel philosophy) and for about one generation through psychology, has been promoted, by governmental tenured teachers.-Declaration of Freedom of Religion and Morality from Governmental Subversion (1995) John Nowak-
  5. 2004 Fact: "A democracy is lost, when government selects and aligns itself with human behavior groups, through expertise status, involuntary enforcement in our courts, government agencies, armed forces, schools and universities (their grand buildings liken to temples of the state), by the amount of trillions of tax dollars, over the human behavior group of Christianity." -Vision to Restore Democracy And Biblical Morality of our Founding Fathers (2004) John Nowak-
  6. 2007 Fact: "Professors, teachers of Psychology, Psychiatry, Sociology and Philosophy (infidel philosophy) have become as the nations priest to indoctrinate, dictate, program directly and indirectly their students (disciples), influencing unconstitutionally votes, causing the sensitive gage, the ballot box, elections to display faulty readings, especially the last forty to sixty years in America and democracies through out the world." -Constitutional Spirit Three Amendments to the Constitution (2007) John Nowak-
  7. 2007 Fact: "Will America see? She has gone off the mainstream spirit ( vital principle/mental disposition) of neutrality toward establishments, chartered by her founding fathers. Resulting in the primary source of subversion around the world of religion and particularly morality is from the State making laws respecting the establishments of philosophy and psychology." -Constitutional Spirit Three Amendments to the Constitution (2007) John Nowak-
  8. 2010 Fact: "Our founding fathers when written the constitution in 1787, had little clue, government will someday be a respecter of philosophy (infidel philosophy) and psychology in the vast government university and education system. Being the first government university institution wasn't established until 1801. All universities up until 1801 were of private citizenry. Yale, Princeton, many of religious grass roots. Wasn't until around 1879, Psychology began in German universities, acclaimed by the so called intelligentsia as a so called science. -Our Nation has a New Enemy Within Army of Disciples in Philosophy (infidel Philosophy) (2010) John Nowak-

To present a thorough case, we must go back in time to carefully observe the earliest sources, factual evidence of the formation of Judeo-Christian influence and have a detail study of the Establishment Clause "Wall of Separation" regarding secular religions.

(1600's to 1850's) Judeo-Christian Principled Heritage Base of our Constitution and Government

  1. Fact (1644) Roger Williams (Wikipedia) began the colony of Providence Plantation, which provided a refuge for religious minorities and non religious. Williams was a student of Native American languages and an advocate for fair dealings with Native Americans. Williams was arguably the first abolitionist in North America, having organized the first attempt to prohibit slavery in any of the original thirteen colonies.

  2. Fact: Williams took from many of the bible's old and new testament references to support and establish the principle “liberty of conscience” religious and non religious conscious, not to be persecuted by civil government. Williams described it as "hedge or wall of Separation between the Garden of the Church and the Wilderness of the world" the bed rock for “freedom of speech”, “freedom of the press”, and the First Amendment's “Establishment Clause” and "Free Exercise Clause".

  3. Fact: Williams first and later Locke used the parable of Jesus (Matt. 13:24-30) to support toleration, liberty of conscience:

  • Matt 13: 24 He put another parable before them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field, 25 but while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds (tares) among the wheat and went away. 26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. 27 And the servants of the master of the house came and said to him, ‘Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have weeds?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ So the servants said to him, ‘Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, lest in gathering the weeds (tares) you root up the wheat along with them. 30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.
  1. Fact: When the kingdom of heaven/church government is compared to civil government, the kingdom of heaven/church government awaits the final judgment of God, to deal with the tares, violators of the kingdom of heaven/church's rules and laws. Only does the the civil government become involved, when secular civil rules for the common good and peace of the state are broken.

  2. Fact: On the basis of a parable of Jesus in the New Testament, 1300 years of the State Catholic and State Protestant persecution of conscious would begin to crumble.

  3. Fact: (1776) Thomas Pain's wrote a book/tract “Common Sense” published on January 10, 1776 cited the argument, specifically stated in the old testament of the bible, that God was against having kings, that they will take advantage of them eventually, and overburden the people.

  4. Fact: “Common Sense” became the most widely published book at it's time, the equivalent if sold today, would be 15,000,000 copies in just three months.

  5. Fact: Paine gave his royalties from Common Sense to George Washington’s continental army. So the compelling interwoven secular/supernatural bible argument from the bible not only helped to give cause, support, it even fought the war by funding the war to establish our freedom and liberty. Can be said a book tip the scales, gave you your freedom and liberty today.

  6. Fact: Early Israel had a senate (elderly men in a representative body) representing the twelve tribes of Israel consisted of 70 elders (a 1,000 years before the establishment of ancient Greek senate).

  7. Fact: "55 Founding Fathers, we know what their sworn public confessions were. Twenty-eight were Episcopalians, eight were Presbyterians, seven were Congregationalists, two were Lutheran, two were Dutch Reformed, two were Methodist, two were Roman Catholic, one is unknown, and only three were deists --Williamson, Wilson, and Franklin." "Of the 55 delegates, virtually all of them were deeply committed Christians. Only three were deists. Even Franklin is equivocal because, though not an orthodox Christian, Franklin seems to have abandoned his deism early in life and moved back towards his Puritan roots. Indeed, it was 81 year old Franklin's emotional call to humble prayer on June 28, 1787, that was actually the turning point for a hopelessly stalled Constitutional convention. We have his appeal on record thanks to James Madison who took copious notes of the whole proceeding. His appeal contained no less than four direct quotations from Scripture. This does not sound like a man who was hostile to the Christian religion." http://www.inplainsite.org/html/america_unchristian_beginnin.html

  8. Fact (1776) “Declaration of Independence” from the tyrannical king, an appeal by the founding fathers representing the people was to a God, referred four times to as  “nature's God”, “creator”, “supreme judge of the world”,  and “with a firm reliance on the PROTECTION of Divine Providence”.

  9. Fact (1887) Ben Franklin at age 81, stood up during the framing of our nation's Constitution, inadvertently testified as to the founding father's mental disposition during the days of the Revolutionary war “we had daily prayers in this room for Divine protection”, in his request for prayer. Franklin quoted from the bible's old and New testament pointing to the particular God of the Judea - Christian persuasion.

  10. Fact: What The Founding Fathers said = University of Houston wondered if there was something unique about the government of the U.S. They gathered 15,000 quotes from the Founders and located where all of them came from. They then boiled that down to 3,154 quotes that had significant impact on the founding of America. It took them 10 years to finish the project, but they found that the three men most quoted by the Founding fathers were Blackstone, Montesquieu, and John Locke. They also found that the Bible was quoted: 4 times more often than Montesquieu, 12 times more often than Blackstone, and 16 times more often than Locke. Additionally, 34% of all quotes were from the Bible, and another 60% of the quotes were from men who were using the Bible to arrive at their conclusions. Added together, 94% of all the quotes of the Founders had their origin in the Bible, which shows the importance of God's word in their lives and of this Nation's founding. Quotes

  11. Fact: The U.S. Government was greatly influence and has much basis upon the Judeo-Christian principled morality and form of government particularly contained in the N.T. Church government order (non-denominational), with some slight variation, which is our nation's Judeo-Christian heritage. As similar to N.T. Church government of independent congregations there are independent states in our nation, where each state has its own government. The states similar as in the N.T. has elders (are overseers) and deacons (took care of the individual needs of the people), are defined in other words senators (means elders in Greek are overseers) and representatives (took care of the individual needs of the people).:

  12. Fact: The United States Federal Government is modeled slightly different in respects, being must have literal centralized planning and an army to protect a literal nation so we have a literal centralized government. In a federal government also modeled after a groups of elders and deacons in another words senators and representatives, and a central figure in the president. Compared to the N.T. Church of only independent congregations are only subject to the king of Kings and his apostles written words in rules and laws contained in the N.T as their sole centralized form of government.

  13. Fact: Our government was guided and modeled on principles of secular logic, morality particularly more so Christian New Testament teachings contained in the bible, having some but not exclusive relation to old testament principles, relating to living in harmony and peace with your fellow neighbor.

  14. Fact: The New Testament is called the perfect law of liberty. (James 1:25)

  15. Fact: Our Constitution has the phrase “Secure the Blessings of Liberty” indirectly gives homage to a God's providence of liberty.

  16. Fact: Our Constitution ends with "Seventeenth Day of September in The Year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty Seven."

  17. Fact: On Dec.15, 1791 was ratified the first Amendment of the Constitution called the “Establishment Clause" and “Free Exercise Clause”.

  18. Fact: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of Religion; or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”

  19. Fact: That is up until recently, we have another State Religion in a non-traditional secular religion "Morphed-Infidelism", cloaked itself with a mere appearance of science, having a equivalent God effect as in mere appearances are truthful and correct to slip under the high wall of separation of State and Religion. Where once again a religion was place in all government institutions. Worst of all particularity placed in the courts of the land, that have persecuted "liberty of conscious" of citizens, used coercion, forced indoctrination and brain damaging drugging, to severely harm citizens even deaths, fleece Uncle Sam, the American citizenry in the trillions of multiple underlying cost, driving up the nation's deficit and medical cost rapidly.

  20. Fact: George Washington - Farewell Speech,  gave homage to God: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness--these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens."

  21. Fact: John Adams SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; JUDGE; DIPLOMAT; ONE OF TWO SIGNERS OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS; SECOND PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES gave homage to God: Oct 11, 1798 ”We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”, On 28 June 1813 John Adams wrote "The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were... the general principles of Christianity. …Now I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God", and the son of John Adams, John Quincy Adams Sixth President of the United States wrote in 1850 "The law given from Sinai was a civil and municipal as well as a moral and religious code; it contained many statutes . . . of universal application-laws essential to the existence of men in society, and most of which have been enacted by every nation which ever professed any code of laws."

  22. Fact: Thomas Jefferson words gave homage to God, are engraved on his Memiorial in Washington D.C.: “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital)

  23. Fact: Nation's heritage much was derived from the bible (means book), A LIBRARY OF 66 Books/letters, forty mostly elderly authors documenting detailed higher order of human behavior interactions, multiple generations through a time span of 4,000 years, thousands of human behavior interactions of worldly things:

  24. Fact: Thomas Jefferson's book divided out the secular content in the new testament from the supernatural content. Jefferson admired, wrote of Jesus secular logic as “most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man”. Jefferson’s book was printed by the U.S. government from 1904 to 1958 and given to every congressmen. Shows overwhelming evidence that the bible contains secular logic, that can't to a reasonable person, be denied.

  25. Fact: There are secular teachings, logic, principles contained in the bible.

  26. Fact: The word “secular” has two particular usages, one of which is: “of or pertaining to worldly things” The bible contains plenty of worldly things. In which Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers, many of whom were fully aware.

  27. Fact: The bible contains three types of spirit/logic: 

  1. distinctly secular spirit/logic in a sentence,

  2. distinctly supernatural spirit/logic in a sentence

  3. Interwoven, combined secular and supernatural spirit/logic in a sentence.

  1. Fact: "Spirit” has an important distinction AMONG A FEW distinctions in the bible, one particular distinction/concept is found in the highly acclaimed book, over a hundred years of research by hundreds of scholars into usages of words in the biblical era, called the exhaustive Strong's Concordance).

  2. Fact: 1984 edition Strong’s Concordance 4151: spirit = mental disposition, etc spirit, spiritual, spiritually, mind.

  3. Fact: The spirit or mental disposition, mind, be it – secular – or – supernatural – or combined, is the intent in the writer, or speaker behind their words. In another words, the word spirit equates to how we use the word psychology. The bible and it's forty authors describe the intent, mental disposition, mind in the word “spirit” at times. The word spirit was used around 600 times of either secular logic or supernatural logic in the bible.

  4. Fact: The bible in the words “Spirit, spiritual and spiritually” is ahead by thousands of years of the world's newer terminology “psychology, psychological and psychologically.

  5. Fact: Particularly in the Book of King Solomon named "Proverbs" in the Old testament exist hundreds of secular observations/studies of higher order of human behavior for young men to guide them, written in a very precise, short manner, called wisdom and proverbs.

  6. Fact: (1858) Abraham Lincoln used Mark 3:25 from the New testament, Jesus' statement “And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand” upon accepting the Illinois Republican Party's nomination as that state's United States senator. The “house divided” statement is in the bible can cut either way of the world only (secular) or supernaturally. Abraham Lincoln’s most acclaimed statement galvanizing his comprehension to the people his understanding of potential future events. “A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South."

  7. Fact: Many atheist, communist, socialist, evolutionist, and progressives, who are devotees to the unconstitutional State Secular Religion of morphed infidelism prop up in government will never acknowledge the bible contains large amounts of secular observations/studies of human behavior, lest they lose their Unconstitutional Secular Religion of Morphed Infidelism in government that is empowering them.

  8. Fact: Devotees to the unconstitutional State Secular Religion of Morphed infidelism will resort to infidelism's classic main weapon “ridicule and misinformation” to intimidate, marginalize and silence the truth.


Detail study of the Establishment Clause, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution regarding a Secular Religion:

First Amendment, Establishment Clause: 

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."


Founding fathers primary focus:  Establishments/Sects of Christianity: Baptist, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, Anglican, etc.

Founding fathers secondary focus:  Establishments/Traditional religions: Christianity, Jewish, Islam, Hinduism, etc.


Nation's judeo-Christian Heritage exception: 

  1. All govt ELECTED officials beginning from the first document of the nation, the Declaration of Independence a petition, constitutionally permitted to give homage to “nature's God”, “creator”, “supreme judge of the world”, and “with a firm reliance on the PROTECTION of Divine Providence”, similar petitions and homage on the nations monuments, buildings, later currency, in elected officials prayers and the bible as a universally recognized source of both supernatural and secular knowledge of the founding fathers.

  2. Ben Franklin at age 81, stood up during the framing of our nation's Constitution, inadvertently testified as to the founding father's mental disposition during the days of the Revolutionary war “we had daily prayers in this room for Divine protection”, in his request for prayer. Franklin quoted inadvertently testified from the bible's old and New testament pointing to the founding fathers particular God of the Judea - Christian persuasion.

  3. Government bureaucrats since they are non elected are simply the function of civil government are forbidden to initiate others during their government work hours in any official function prayer or homage to God.

  4. Exception in standard based heritage studies of the nation. I suggest comprise by every state legislature body, respecting the founding fathers neutrality towards all sects of Christianity.

  5. Elected officials and all citizens including children can initiate alone or others in prayer and homage to God at anytime, during any government function. Courtesy both ways. 


Founding fathers third focus:  Establishments/Secular religions: 

  1. Fact: When the establishment clause was crafted, was shown caution for neutrality sake, carefully selected were the words “establishment of religion” to differentiate between sects of Christianity, all types of religion, and even remotely a secular religion are not to be respected by Congress.

  2. Fact: Atheist hyper-reinterpreted the establishment clause, deceitfully prefer to exchange the word "establishment" to the word "Church" and erroneous argue, portraying anything that has mere association to “church”,  must be walled off from govt.

  3. Fact: They did not use the word “church” in the Establishment clause.

  4. Fact: Thomas Jefferson did not write the establishment clause.

  5. Fact; Jefferson 13 years afterwards when newly elected as the third president of the nation in 1802, responded to a letter from the baptist. Jefferson first reference citing the establishment cause in the constitutional. Jefferson continued to write, created a shortened phraseology, a summary in the words, “thus building a wall of separation between church and state” which in essence reiterated Roger Williams, who used many bible observations, to show the bible argues and supports a principle of sensible separation. Roger Williams phrase it in these words “hedge or wall of Separation between the Garden of the Church and the Wilderness of the world” in his book in 1644.

  6. Fact: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court, in Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments “may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment.”

  7. Fact: In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: “In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state. 

  8. Fact: All four situations have the use of the word “church” 1.) in Roger Williams phrase in his book (1644), 2.) used by Thomas Jefferson (1802) in a letter, and the 3.) two Supreme court cases. 

  9. Fact: The plain reason for the specific word “church”, each situation above was dealing with particularly Christianity at the time, which is understandable. 

  10. Fact: Even so the word "church" was not used in the First Amendment of the Constitution.

  11. Fact: The reason why the the word "church" was not used in the First Amendment of the Constitution, is the tremendous weaknesses in the word “church” instead of the words "establishment of religion" particularly among atheist, whom many had been indoctrinated by the state into morphed infidelism (a form of atheism and a secular religion), etc. are now great adversaries against the bible/Christianity. Combine this with many atheist are ignorant of the bible's large amount of useful secular knowledge, will only point to statements that used the word “church”,  erroneous argue, portraying anything that has mere association to “church”,  must be walled off from govt. They decieve themselves and their listeners.

  12. Fact: The bible had greatly influence the rights of man by way of Roger Williams and the founding fathers, the heritage exception rule, historical founding founders statements in the founding documents. 

  13. Fact: The bible contains much secular knowledge and most importantly that the bible has three types of spirit/logic: 

1.) distinctly secular spirit/logic in a sentence very useful to the founding fathers, and later presidents

2.) combined secular and supernatural spirit/logic in a sentence useful to the founding fathers

3.) distinctly supernatural spirit/logic in a sentence

  1. Fact: It is the bible's secular knowledge of the surrounding world and studies, observations of higher forms of human behavior that was and still is very beneficial.

  2. Fact: Clear examples of secular knowledge is found in the the book of Proverbs, called wisdom, and other books of the bible exist hundreds of studies and observations of higher order forms of human behavior.

  3. Fact: "The establishment of psychology, a human behavior group, and a state secular establishment of religion originated from philosophy entered U.S. State universities in the 1890's afforded by rudimentary human behavior replicatablity having an aura of scientific respectability, slowly obtained government funding, publicity and prominence. While in govt had breached the Establishment clause "Wall of Separation" of the First Amendment, transformed itself into a secular religion by the aura of scientific respectability to cloak higher order of human behavior experimentation that is non-replicatable, was pawned to deceived Congresses and many citizens."

  4. Fact: "The U.S. Constitution is liken to a well crafted compass, precisely created mechanisms of government focus down to the delicately balanced needle empowering the people that directs the country in the proper course. The First Amendment's Establishment Clause is the fine turning of the compass meant to stop establishments of religion even an establishment of a non-traditional secular religion an unconstitutional mechanism from being placed in the compass. Reason is a non-traditional secular religion mechanism even if at first the affect is undetectable, but gradually through years and decades the affect substantially increases drawing the needle slowly further from it's true bearing, even while elections cycles swings the needle giving an illusion the bearing is true. The needle is off its true bearing, our country has fallen off course into chaos, where many citizens are harmed, suffer and many die."

  5. Fact: Congress must uphold the First Amendment of the Establishment Clause, remove the secular religion from government.


Section II

History of Infidel Philosophy (anti-Christian regurgitated, morphed ancient Greek philosophy)

  1. Fact: History shows us a similar age of tremendous immorality occurred: 1790's "Darkest period Spiritually and morally in the histyory of American Christianity" "As the Eighteenth century drew to a close in America, there was one of the darkest period in the time. ... infiltration of French infidelity. Infidel clubs were popular (before there were government funded universities or colleges). They were made up of men and women who studied the works of Voltaire, Voiney, and Paine, and indulged in all sorts of based and lascivious practices. In one such club it was said that the conduct of the females was such as to illustrate the practical effects of their beliefs. Not one of them could or would pretend to know who was the father of their offspring.", "Joel Parker wrote: We are fast becoming a nation of drunkards. We could ascertain that there are 300,000 drunkards in our land and that from ten to twenty thousand were annually assigned to the drunkard's graves. Piety seems to be flying out of our land, religion declined, morality extinguished, vice grew bold, profaneness, reveling, dishonesty,...","Youths, particularly those who have been liberally educated, and who, with strong passions and feeble principles, were votaries of sensuality and ambition, delighted in the prospect of unrestrained gratification, and, panting to be enrolled with men of passion and splendor, became enamored of the new [infidel] doctrines." (Christians Only: A History of the Restoration Movement, James D. Murch)

  1. Fact: "...it was said that the infidels of France raised among themselves three million francs for the purpose of printing and distributing books to corrupt the minds of the American People. Timothy Dwight President 1795-1817 of Yale, in 1797, to the candidates for the baccalaureate preached on: The Nature and Danger of infidel philosophy” pointed out a clear list of the characteristics, traits and tendencies of Philosophy (infidel Philosophy). Mr. Dwight's book is credited as one of the embers of the Second Great Awakening. His text was Colossians 2:8: “beware lest any many spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of man, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ”, “The philosophy (infidel) which has opposed Christianity in every succeeding age has uniformity wore the same character, with that described in the text. It has rested on the same foundations, proceeded from the same dispositions, aimed at the same ends and produced the same means. Satisfied with the justice of these assertions, I feel it, young gentlemen, to be my duty on this occasion to exhort you to beware lest you become prey to the philosophy (infidel philosophy) which opposes the Gospel; to prove to you this philosophy is vain and deceitful; to show you that you are in danger of becoming a prey to it; and to dissuade you by several arguments from thus yielding yourself a prey. I shall endeavor to prove to you, that this Philosophy is vain and deceitful" -Timothy Dwight-“You will observe, that it is a particular kind of Philosophy (infidel), against which all my arguments are directed. Philosophy at large, or the use and the attainments of our reason, in the candid and careful examination of every question, within the limits of our understanding, so far as it springs from a real desire of investigating truth, and proceeds on satisfactory evidence, is not only undeserving of censure, but deserving of the highest praise." -Timothy Dright-

  2. "He showed them that infidel philosophy of their day was merely a revival of what other philosophers taught. In this sermon he put these philosophers, as it were, in a procession. He made them march, one by one, before his listeners as he unfolded their teaching and the character it produced. (Christians Only: A History of the Restoration Movement, James D. Murch pp 19-26)

  1. Philosophers: Zeno taught, that all crimes were equal; that we ought never to forgive injuries; and that the most abominable lewdness is lawful.
  2. Plato taught that lewdness was justifiable and Cicero, that it was a crime of small magnitude.
  3. Aristippus taught that both theft and adultery were lawful.
  4. Menippus, because he had lost a sum of money, murdered himself; as did also Zeno, Cleanthes, Chrysippus, Cleombrotus, Cato the younger, and Brutus.
  5. Many of the ancient philosophers were noted for sodomy Seneca, Aristippus, Zeno and Zenophen.
  6. Xenophon was a notorious sodomite, and said in the absence of a boy, whom he kept. I would be blind to all things else, so that I might see Clinias” and again, “ thanks to the sun, which discloses to me the face of Clinias.”
  7. Plutarch, acknowledge the fact, makes for them an apology, that, though they corrupted their bodies, they made them amends for it by improving their souls.
  8. Both Zeno and Cleanthes taught that children may lawfully roast and eat their own parents as any other food.
  9. Diogenes and the Cynics generally taught that parents may lawfully sacrifice and eat their children.
  10. (Philosopher Lord Bolingbroke 1678—1751)  
  • man is only a superior animal;
  • that man's chief end is to gratify the appetites and inclinations of the flesh.
  • Adultery is no violation of the law, or religion of nature;
  • that there is no wrong in lewdness except in the highest incest;
  • that the law or religion of nature forbids no incest except between the nearest relations and plainly supposes that all men and woman are unchaste and that there is no such thing as conjugal fidelity.
  1. Mr. Hume (Philosopher David Hume (1711 – 1776) declares:
  • that man is a mere machine, that is, an object operated on by external causes;
  • that suicide or self murder is lawful and commendable and of course virtuous;
  • that adultery must be practice, if we would obtain all the advantages of life;
  • that female infidelity (or adultery) when known is a small thing, when unknown, nothing,
  • that skepticism is the true and only wise wisdom of man;
  • that it is unreasonable to believe God to be wise and good.
  • The mortality and immateriality of the soul;
  • the doctrine that man is a mere animal,
  • that animal gratification is the chief end of our being,
  • that right and wrong depend solely on the decision of the magistrate;
  • that ridicule is the test of truth;
  • that we may lawfully get all things, if we get them safely;
  • that modesty is inspired only by prejudice and has its foundation in the mere desire of appearing to be superior to animals.
  • Adultery is lawful according to the religion of nature...
  1. “When we view the pernicious tendency of these doctrines, we may safely say that thoroughly practiced, they would overwhelm the world with that misery which scriptures exhibit as experience only in hell.” -Timothy Dwight-

Classic infidelism Ideologies main elements are:

  • there is no God or if there is a God it is unreasonable to believe God to be wise and good (anti-biblical)
  • lewdness, (anti-biblical)
  • adultery-Infidelity when known is a small thing, when unknown, nothing, (anti-biblical)
  • Man's chief end is to gratify the appetites and inclinations of the flesh, in other words one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) when unknown, nothing (morphed, rebranded mid 1800's as "free love", multiple sex partners, radical sex) (anti-biblical), Contrast to the Historical biblical concept of "One Flesh Marriage" basis of shot gun marriages (biblical)
  • legalize moral vice making it seemingly safe, (anti-biblical)
  • premeditated murder of defenseless babies resulting from Man's chief end is to gratify the appetites and inclinations of the flesh (anti-biblical)
  • sodomy (anti-biblical)
  • suicide (anti-biblical)
  • that we may lawfully get all things, if we get them safely (anti-biblical)
  • that right and wrong depend solely on the decision of the magistrate (anti-biblical)
  • ridicule-misinformation-deceitful (anti-biblical)

Definition for Deceitful = intended to deceive; misleading; fraudulent: a deceitful action http://www.dictionary.com/browse/deceitful

  1. "Dwright warned them against another source of danger; namely, the contempt and ridicule with which Christianity is opposed. (Christians Only: A History of the Restoration Movement, James D. Murch)

  1. Lord Shaftesbury was a master in ridicule.

  2. Voltarie (1694-1778) said "Render those pedants as enormously ridiculous as you can. Ridicule will do everything."

  1. To this Dwight replied "The cause which needs these weapons cannot be just; the doctrine which cannot be supported without them must be false.”

  2. "He warned them against the bias of the world toward infidelity."

  1. Consider Mr. Dwight words were said 5 years before there was any government provided public education until 1801, previously all education institutions were mainly of religious private funded origins, teaching mainly up to 18 years of age. Compared to today there are about 1,800 public so called education institutions of so called higher learning, and about 100,000 public primary schools.

  2. "The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next." -Abraham Lincoln- 

  3. Our Government has become a House Built Upon Sand, as Abraham Lincoln in 1858 quoted from Jesus' words "A house divided against itself can't stand", another quote of Jesus bears a principled truth: "...likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it" -John Nowak 2014-

  1. Fact: Since then Infidel Philosophy's (unbeliever's) tenets have morphed were repackaged - rebranded as to hide their true origins/identity, to deceive many again causing misery and ruin in many broken lives, resulted in the combined deaths of 2-3 billion. Having a stack deck, Junk/Fake Science was sold under the lie as science, given a Supreme being truth, correctness-effect becomes a State Secular Religion:
  1. 1840's Infidel Philosophy sociology, free divorce, utoptian socialist-socialism, free divorce, frminism, complex marriage, free love - based on Atheistic world view,1966 Free love taught/lectured at the Univerity of California, Berkley with university approval. Today taught as safe sex to teenagers.
  2. 1859 Infidel Philosophy evolution - racism- based on atheistic world view
  3. 1879 Infidel Philosophy psychology - based on atheistic world view 
  4. 1930- 1950's Infidel Philosophy psychiatry - based on atheistic world view

(Early 1800's to mid 1800's) Infidel Philosophy morphed into being called "sociology" - based on atheistic (anti-Judeo Christian) world view. http://www.christjustified.com/Secular-Religion-Gate.html#1840s_atheistic_Infidel_Philosophy


Classical Infidel Philosophy leudness, infidelity, adultery:

Plato taught that lewdness was justifiable and Cicero, that it was a crime of small magnitude.
Aristippus taught that both theft and adultery were lawful.
( 1678—1751Philosopher Lord Bolingbroke) Adultery is lawful according to the religion of nature...
  • Man's chief end is to gratify the appetites and inclinations of the flesh.
  • Adultery is no violation of the law, or religion of nature;
  • There is no wrong in lewdness except in the highest incest;
(1711 – 1776) Philosopher David Hume taught that:
  • adultery must be practice, if we would obtain all the advantages of life
  • that female infidelity (or adultery) when known is a small thing, when unknown, nothing,
  • that animal gratification is the chief end of our being,
  • that we may lawfully get all things, if we get them safely;
  • that modesty is inspired only by prejudice and has its foundation in the mere desire of appearing to be superior to animals.

Sociology is simply cloaked (anti-judea Christian) philosophy was created with two elements, its first element was called  free divorce, feminism, complex marriage, then free love, which sprang its second element socialism/communism. The second element was championed by Karl Marx, its first element was championed again in 1966, where free love was taught/lectured at the Univerity of California, Berkley with university approval. Then in the 1980's free love morphed into being called safe sex, and was taught to tens of millions of teenagers.


(Early 1800's to mid 1800's) Sociology element two called free divorce, feminism, complex marriage, free love


"...sociologist Herbert Spencer argued in his Principles of Sociology for the implementation of free divorce." Wikipedia
 "Utopian socialism "Sharing the free-love ideals of the earlier social movements—as well as their feminism, pacifism, and simple communal life—were the utopian socialist communities of early-nineteenth-century France and Britain, associated with writers and thinkers such as Henri de Saint-Simon and Charles Fourier in France, and Robert Owen in England. Fourier, April 1772 – 10 October 1837) was a French philosopher and an influential early socialist thinker later associated with "utopian socialism". Fourier is, for instance, credited with having originated the word feminism in 1837... argued that true freedom could only occur without masters, without the ethos of work, and without suppressing passions: the suppression of passions is not only destructive to the individual, but to society as a whole. He argued that all sexual expressions should be enjoyed as long as people are not abused, and that "affirming one's difference" can actually enhance social integration." Wikipedia
"Robert Owen argued that marriage formed one of an "awful trinity" of oppressors to mankind, as well as religion and private property, and his son Robert Dale was a leading proponent of free divorce. The Saint-Simonian feminist Pauline Roland took a free-love stance against marriage, having four children in the 1830s, all of whom bore her name." Wikipedia
 "Free love began to coalesce into a movement in the mid to late 19th century. The term was coined by the socialist writer John Humphrey Noyes, although he preferred to use the term 'complex marriage'.   Wikipedia

(1840's) "Sociology" one of its founders is Karl Max, also founder of communism/socialism (credited to murdered 147 million people). http://www.scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/

(Early 1800's to mid 1800's) Sociology element two called utoptian socialist-socialism, scientific socialism, socialism/communism.

Socialist - communism
  • The father of communism a sociologist Karl Marx 1840's, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx (Wikipedia) “Karl Marx was born on 5 May 1818 to Heinrich Marx  ….”, “Largely non-religious, Heinrich was a man...interested in the ideas of the philosophers Immanuel Kant and Voltaire. “, “A classic liberal...”. “Young Karl was privately educated, by Heinrich Marx, until 1830 ,...he entered Trier High School, whose headmaster, Hugo Wyttenbach, was a friend of his father. ...employing many liberal humanists as teachers, “In October 1835 at the age of 17, Marx travelled to the University of Bonn wishing to study philosophy ...”, “...Marx and Bauer were both atheists...”.  ...they scandalised their class by getting drunk, laughing in church, and galloping through the streets on donkeys.[48]”. “In 1843, Marx became co-editor of a new, radical leftist Parisian newspaper, the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher (German-French Annals), then being set up by the German socialist Arnold Ruge to bring together German and French radicals “, “spring of 1845 his continued study of political economy, capital and capitalism had led Marx to the belief that the new political economic theory that he was espousing—scientific socialism—needed to be built on the base of a thoroughly developed materialistic view of the world."

(1966) Berkeley University, California is regarded as ground zero for the so called free love movement, allowed a group "Sexual Freedom League" who promoted and practice nude parties and orgies to lecture on tenets of atheistic, infidel (anti-judeo Christian) Philosophy (so called wisdom) "free love". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_love

1966 Free love taught/lectured at the Univerity of California, Berkley with university approval. Dormitories where impressionable youthful citizens, particularly youthful woman were far away from their parent's protection and guidance were susceptible, became pregnant.
  • "in the mid-1960's, the free love movement established a place on U.S. college campuses and contributed to ongoing debates.... In 1963, New York City resident Jefferson Poland established the Sexual Freedom League (SFL) to promote free love (sometimes called free sex) and agitate for political reform, including the repeal of existing laws against abortion. (American Countercultures: An Encyclopedia of Nonconformists, Alternative Lifestyles, and Radical Ideas in U.S. History)
  • "In 1966, having moved to the San Fransisco Bay Area, Poland founded a chapter at University of California, Berkley. Along with its counterpart, the east Bay SFL, the organization achieved national prominence for its promotion of nude parties and sex orgies. In addition to other activities promoting free love, the group distributed literature on birth control, abortion, and sexually transmitted diseases on the college campus and lectured on these subjects with university approval.: An Encyclopedia of Nonconformists, Alternative Lifestyles, and Radical Ideas in U.S. History)
  • 1967 Summer of Love https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_of_Love
  • 1960's) Free love - Wikipedia
  • 1960's Infidel Philosophy "Man's chief end is to gratify the appetites and inclinations of the flesh" - based on atheistic world view, in other words "One Flesh" (mutual consented sexual intercourse) when unknown, was regarded as nothing, had morphed in being rebranded to sound more palatable in the mid 1800's, as "free love". Its supporters, believers partially through ignorance, selfishness, and rejection had attacked the biblical concept of "One Flesh" marriage the basis of shot gun marriages and promoted the premeditated murder of free love's unwanted babies in abortions (60,000,000 deaths USA, racist particularly more so Black babies in a Black Holocaust, 1.4 billion deaths across the world since 1980). Free love increased sodomy, the numbers of sodomist (aids 30,000,000 deaths), increase sexually transmitted diseases (110 million infected), and later taught as "safe sex" to teenagers by Government Schools. So called free love more recently brought us so called sodomist marriages:

(1980's) Free love was re-branded, disguised as so called "safe sex" taught to tens of millions of teenagers, promoted a mutiple sexual partners culture lifestyle rejecting self control, rejected marriage recognition/certificate, consequently in the heat of passion without self control throwing off so called safe sex http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/17/studies-birth-control-contraception-dont-cut-abortions/, responsible for the premeditated murder of 60,000,000 babies, where so called free love/safe sex isn't free or safe, creating a yearly three trillion dollar tax and associated expense in:

  1. 70 welfare programs to take care of unwed mothers and their children (yearly cost a trillion dollars) http://dailysignal.com/2011/05/25/price-of-unwed-births-far-greater-than-the-hospital-bills/, increased fatherless children, children without motherly supervision, resulting in lawlessness/crime/drug abuse
  2. additional law enforcement, jails, lawyers, and courts
  3. additional healthcare for associated sexual diseases such as Aids, S.T.D.s infected 110 million americans https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/29/health/chlamydia-syphilis-gonorrhea.html
  4. additional healthcare for other lawlessness/crime/drug abuse associated health problems
  5. additional secular State religion in so called sociology, psychology and psychiatry
  6. in so called Obama care

Fact: Even though overwhelming evidence shows Sociology,  to be atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science, it is instead deceitfully portrayed as unbiased science having a God, Supreme being effect is perceived as true and correct where millions believe in and direct their every aspect of life equivalent to the Judeo-Christian religion groups; which constitutes and fits the defined principle by the United States Supreme court as a secular religion.


Fact: Compared to thousands of years, when a couple (particularly virgins) became one flesh unknown to others and the woman was later found to be pregnant were forced to be officially recognized as married (Historical biblical concept of "One Flesh Marriage" basis of shot gun marriages - biblical, lifetime marriage). The One Flesh Marriage was based upon the principle found in the book of Genesis, marriage begins at the moment of "One Flesh" (mutual consented sexual intercourse) known or unknown to others, affirmed by Moses Laws forced recognition, then affirmed and confirmed by Jesus of Nazareth, assuring the greatest amount of peace and harmony in society, and assuring as much as possible two parent's caring for babies, what we call today a "shot gun marriage".

Fact: Moses had specified laws enforced marriage recognition among youthful couples (particularly virgin woman) who became "one flesh" unknown to others, for civil social peace and harmony, affirmed by Jesus of Nazareth a primary teaching of his church, where in the more recent age was referred to as a shot gun marriage.
Fact: Infidel morphed philosophy junk science blindness took advantage of another blindness in the 450 year old anti-biblical concept "one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) (particularly virgins both male and female) when unknown is deemed as a sin, promulgated and promoted by the Catholic Group in Europe when was a state religion which influence many other religious groups to this day. (Sadly there are many religious people non-Catholics and Catholics would rather not have this exposed, for a number of reasons. Even so I hope you will consider why this major 450 year old error of the Catholic group must be exposed and publicized, if there is going to ever be a return of our nation to a solid ground of life time marriages from virginity to the grave, saving our nation from collapsing within through immorality.)



Fact: The government universities and colleges through their atheistic, infidel morphed philosophy bias junk science blindness in sociology, evolution, psychology, and psychiatry had propagated and promoted separating of youthful couples (particularly virgins) though various means,. - one of which comes down to love of money, filthy lucre, and deceitfulness -, particularly for the students tuition and fees. They kept the impressionable youthful pregnant woman students in their class rooms, hopeless and idolizing love of money in a career over motherhood; were deceived as Eve in the garden were persuaded not to interfere with their schooling, into thinking they aren't premeditated murdering their babies, in the rebranded word "abortion". This created a large segment of the female population into baby murderers, men haters, more evil then Nazism, and radical feminism. Which in part had influenced culture drastically increased the murdering of the youthful couple Complete Genetic Human lives (CGHL) in abortion, consequently started a chain reaction of connected ever increasing destructive multiple dire harmful behaviors.
  1. Fact: (2011) Each year 10 percent of college-age women become pregnant, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization founded by Planned Parenthood. Women 18-24 accounted for 44.4 percent of all abortions in 2008, and 74 percent of women who have abortions say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities. http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?ID=13167
  2. Fact: The male-female ratio in higher education has been steadily moved in favor of the females ever since the 1970s. Total enrollment figures show that females outnumbered their male counterparts for the first time in the late 1970s, and they have steadily increased their numerical advantage ever since. http://www.forbes.com/sites/the-male-female-ratio-in-college
(2008) 43.6 percent male and 56.4 percent female ration attend govenrment universites and colleges

Radical Feminism -Wikipedia

Fact: The 1800 Government Universities and colleges are built on blood money, 60,000,000 premeditated murdered Complete Genetic Human lives (CGHL) in abortion.

Fact: In the 1980's began to be taught "free love" to an even younger generation, morphed, rebranded to sound more palatable, as so called "safe sex" at the monopoly government schools, where 9 out of 10 teenagers are coerced to attend.

Fact: Nation's tremendous cost of morphed-Infidelism so called FREE LOVE and since 1980's morphed, been rebranded, taught as so called SAFE SEX to tens of millions of teenagers and its consequences, multiple partners, uninhibited sex, sodomist and the State not having a law that enforces officially recognizing youthful marriages (particularly involving virgins both the male and female) when occurs one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) unknown to others; America is needlessly spending over a trillion dollars a year in trying to remedy unwed births, that is failing miserably and is a major factor for the National deficit bankrupting our nation:
  1. Increased unwanted babies
  2. Increased premeditated murder of babies in abortions (60,000,000)
  3. Increased womanizers
  4. Increased the number of adulterers, adultery
  5. Increased broken marriages
  6. Increased domestic violence
  7. Increased single mothers
  8. Increased poverty
  9. Increased drug addiction
  10. Increased crime
  11. Increased medical cost
  12. increased mentally unstable citizens
  13. Increased radical feminist, men haters, for men leaving them behind after taking advantage of them
  14. Increased distrust between opposite sexes consequently they turned to having sex with their own sex
  15. Increased the number of sodomist
  16. Increased the number of men and woman dressing up as the opposite sex
  17. Increased suicides
  18. Increased Big Government, big brother, nanny state
  19. Increased the need for more police, judges, and lawyers
  20. Increased the number of jails and jail population
  21. Increased State secular religion of unconstitutionally atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science sociology, psychology and brain damaging psychiatry drugs pretending to fix the chaos, instead are contributing factors creating the chaos for filthy lucre/money
  22. Increased dependents on the State, many disabled from the brain damaging psychiatry drugs for life costing tax payers billions
  23. Increased child abuse in its many forms
  24. Increased fatherless children during the full length of childhood and early teen years is a form of child abuse equivalent to child sexual abuse, a child in both instances is devalued, the parent has stop proper obligational care.
  25. Increased motherless children, during the full length of childhood and early teen years is a form of child abuse equivalent to child sexual abuse, a child in both instances is devalued, love of money/greed wins over the child, instilled in the child to love money/greed over others, creating a  generation of greed ravaging America, the parent has stop proper obligational care. Proper parent caring for their children is a pillar, just as much as religion and morality are pillars, great duties of men and citizens stated by George Washington in his farewell address as our first President of our nation. Many woman are chasing careers have neglected their children a form of child abuse, millions of children are raised at child care centers instead of by their mothers. Its one thing in an emergency a mother may need to work at times, but the State to make policies that propagates motherless children the full length of childhood and early teen years is a form of State sponsored child abuse:
  1. State's policy not having a law that enforces officially recognizing when becomes known youthful marriages when occurred at the moment of one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse particularly when both were virgins) unknown to others, results in fatherless children, and consequently even brings about motherless children, a form of child abuse
  2. State's policy in its Government Big Academia's self interest for money/filthy lucre for  particularly woman students tuition and fees, preys on two types of mothers "...public universities ... male-female ratio of 43.6–56.4.http://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2012/02/16/the-male-female-ratio-in-college/#513e27031525", promoting mothers to continue or start a career, consequently brings about motherless children, child abuse:
  1. Mothers who due to government not forcible recognizing their youthful marriage occurred at the moment of one flesh, are alone must defend for themselves, are entice to leave their children behind by government Big Academia for a career creating motherless children, child abuse
  2. Mothers who are living relatively comfortable with a husband, are entice to leave their children behind by government Big Academia for a career seeking riches creating motherless children, is a form of child abuse
  1. As for Mothers who are wealthy are in a class of their own child abusers, they hire nannies to raise their children is a form of child abuse, the child is devalued below the mother's care of the world/selfishness, is a form of child abuse
  1. Increased sexually transmitted diseases (1970's onward) Sexually transmitted diseases (110 million in USA) from so called Free Love Philosophy.
  2. (1970's onward) Aids (30,000,000 deaths) from so called Free Love Philosophy increased sodomy.
  3. (1980 onward) Infidelism Morphed into Abortion Philosophy (60,000,000 deaths USA, 1.4 billion deaths across the world)
  4. Earth Day: Abortion Has Killed 1-2 Billion Worldwide in 50 Years
  5. Infanticide in America, Obama voted against born alive (video)
  6. MAAFA 21 THE BLACK HOLOCAUST (video) "Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America. 78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn't that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, "Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated." Is her vision being fulfilled today?"
  7. Increased spending of tax dollars (trillion dollars a year) so Government can pretend its fixing the train wreck, created the national debt of 20 trillion

(September 2009 Heritage.org) "Since the beginning of the War on Poverty, government has spent $15.9 trillion (in inflation-adjusted 2008 dol­lars) on means-tested welfare. In comparison, the cost of all other wars in U.S. history was $6.4 trillion (in inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars).

In his first two years in office, President Barack Obama will increase annual federal welfare spending by one-third from $522 billion to $697 billion. The combined two-year increase will equal almost $263 billion ($88.2 bil­lion in FY 2009 plus $174.6 billion in FY 2010). After adjusting for inflation, this increase is two and a half times greater than any previous increase in federal welfare spending in U.S. history. As a share of the economy, annual fed­eral welfare spending will rise by roughly 1.2 percent of GDP.

Under President Obama, government will spend more on welfare in a single year than President George W. Bush spent on the war in Iraq during his entire presidency. According to the Congressional Research Service, the cost of the Iraq war through the end of the Bush Administration was around $622 billion. By contrast, annual federal and state means-tested welfare spending will reach $888 billion in FY 2010. Federal welfare spending alone will equal $697 billion in that year.

While campaigning for the presidency, Obama lamented that "the war in Iraq is costing each household about $100 per month." Applying the same standard to means-tested welfare spending reveals that welfare will cost each household $560 per month in 2009 and $638 per month in 2010." http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2009/09/Obama-to-Spend-103-Trillion-on-Welfare-Uncovering-the-Full-Cost-of-Means-Tested-Welfare-or-Aid-to-the-Poor

  1. Increased the hidden cost and the tremendous hidden misery of so called free love if could put a price tag on, will be many more trillions of dollars a year
  1. Fact: Where now infidelity-adultery-free love is rampant, immorality that surpasses Hitler in 60,000,000 defenseless babies have been premeditated murdered rebranded as abortion, even recently where now America allows the premeditated murdered baby body parts to be sold for profit. We have even given the highest honor to sodomy, in officially giving the status of marriage.

  1. 1859 Infidel Philosophy Darwin's evolution - atheism - racism - based on atheistic world view:
In 1859 on the eve of the civil war was published by Charles Darwin "The Origin of Species..." proclaiming the "Theory of Evolution", in its full title were the words "...the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life" that was removed in later revisions, even so having the combined effect of saying:
  1. that African American slavery is justified according to the theory of evolution in the preservation of favored races (Darwin's racism)
  2. the bible is false
  3. Moses was a liar in writing the book of Genesis containing creation
  4. Jesus was a liar, when refers to the beginning, creation, Adam and Eve Matt 19:4, Mark 10:6,
  5. Declaration of Independence greatest principle of rights was a big lie "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
  6. the existence of the United States of America was based on a big lie
  7. Founding fathers of our nation were liars
  8. there is no creator/God

Darwin Evolution, racism:

Darwin did distinguish between various human races, or “species of men,” and he believed that some were superior to others (1871, p. 395). Although he steered clear of these ideas in The Origin of Species, his second major work on evolutionary theory, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, published in 1871, did address the issue.

Darwin began the first chapter of The Descent of Man with these words:

“He who wishes to decide whether man is the modified descendant of some pre-existing form, would probably first inquire whether man varies, however slightly, in bodily structure and in mental faculties; and if so, whether the variations are transmitted to his offspring in accordance with the laws which prevail with the lower animals” (1871, p. 395). Later, in his chapter titled “On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man,”

"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla" (p. 521, emp. added).

Apoligictics press "Clearly, Darwin was convinced that the more “civilized races” (e.g., Caucasian) would one day exterminate the more “savage races,” which he considered to be less evolved (and thus more ape-like) than Caucasians. Darwin believed that “the Negro” and “Australian” are more of a sub-species, somewhere between Caucasians and apes."

  1. Fact: The "Theory of Evolution" was introduced on government universities and colleges where exist - extreme bias, having major conflicts of interest, deceitfulness, bigotry --  in a stacked deck of open professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors/scientist and administration who coveted POLITICAL POWER and WEALTH in prominence, name recognition, as individuals, as a group, job protection, increased salaries, tenure, increased pensions, chased lucrative government research grants.  Combined with similar bias scientist, journals, resulted in atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science. Tthey created as many as possible atheistic and infidel philosophy adherents and an muti-billion dollar industry of jobs involving the "Theory of Evolution" in government academia, in many other branches of government such as k-12, museums, and in the private sector such as movies, numerous documentaries, and thousands of books. All combined became an extremely bias panel of judges that bullied/determined the "Theory of Evolution" should be taught as true/fact and to continued being taught as true/fact. All due to the unconstitutional, unchecked power of Big Government Academia, 1800 government Universities and Colleges.

  1. Fact: An universal code, principle of conduct concerning a conflict of interest in any type of judge over any matter, can be obtained in 28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

  1. Fact: It was a forgone conclusion - science wasn't the decided factor - but the - extremely bias, major conflicts of interest, deceitful, bigoted - liberal government academia, scientist and journals having a stacked deck of opening professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy to teach and to continued being taught the "Theory of Evolution" as "true/fact". 

  2. Fact: Precedent U.S Supreme Court cases that reveal types of known secular religions in existence and identifies the particular element that constitutes a secular religion in  “A sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God” in 1961, 1965 and 1970. 

  1. Fact: U.S. Supreme court case in 1961 a U.S Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black commentary concluded that outside of traditional religion is the existence of secular religions. "Among religions in this country which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism, and others." Torcaso v. Watkins, 397 U.S. 488, 495, n.ll (1961) See Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 371, 249 F.2d 127; Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, 153 Cal. App. 2d 673, 315 P.2d 394; II Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 293; 4 Encyclopaedia Britannica (1957 ed.) 325-327; 21 id., at 797; Archer, Faiths Men Live By (2d ed. revised by Purinton), 120-138, 254-313; 1961 World Almanac 695, 712; Year Book of American Churches for 1961, at 29, 47.

Recently I found this section on the internet, I sense it fills in the gap (I colored the text green).

"Is "Secular Humanism" a "Religion"?

John Dewey described Humanism as our "common faith." Julian Huxley called it "Religion without Revelation." The first Humanist Manifesto spoke openly of Humanism as a religion. Many other Humanists could be cited who have acknowledged that Humanism is a religion. In fact, claiming that Humanism was "the new religion" was trendy for at least 100 years, perhaps beginning in 1875 with the publication of The Religion of Humanity by Octavius Brooks Frothingham (1822-1895), son of the distinguished Unitarian clergyman, Nathaniel Langdon Frothingham (1793-1870), pastor of the First Unitarian Church of Boston, 1815-1850. In the 1950's, Humanists sought and obtained tax-exempt status as religious organizations. Even the Supreme Court of the United States spoke in 1961 of Secular Humanism as a religion. It was a struggle to get atheism accepted as a religion, but it happened. From 1962-1980 this was not a controversial issue.

But then Christians began to challenge the "establishment of religion" which Secular Humanism in public schools represented. They used the same tactic Atheists had used to challenge prayer and Bible reading under the "Establishment Clause" of the First Amendment. Now the ACLU is involved. Now the question is controversial. Now Secular Humanists have completely reversed their strategy, and claim that Humanism is not at all religious, but is "scientific."

In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged that Secular Humanism was a religion. Nevertheless, many Humanists deny the significance of the Court's assertion. In order to buttress the claim that the identification of Secular Humanism as a religion in a footnote in the Torcaso case is more than mere "dicta," here is a memorandum prepared "[a]t the request of the staff of the Committee on Education and Labor” by Congressman John B. Conlan.

The U.S. Supreme Court cited Secular Humanism as a religion in the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins (367 U.S. 488). Roy Torcaso, the appellant, a practicing Humanist in Maryland, had refused to declare his belief in Almighty God, as then required by State law in order for him to be commissioned as a notary public. The Court held that the requirement for such an oath "invades appellant's freedom of belief and religion.

The Court declared in Torcaso that the "no establishment" clause of the First Amendment reached far more than churches of theistic faiths, that it is not the business of government or its agents to probe beliefs, and that therefore its inquiry is concluded by the fact of the profession of belief.

The Court stated: We repeat and again reaffirm that neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person to "profess a belief or disbelief in any religion." Neither can constitutionally pass laws or impose requirements which aid all religions as against non-believers,10 and neither can aid those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs.11

Footnote 11 concerning "religions founded on different beliefs" contains the Court's citation of Secular Humanism as a religion. It states

Among religions in this country which do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism, and others. See Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 371, 249 F.2d 127; Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, 153 Cal. App. 2d 673, 315 P.2d 394; II Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 293; 4 Encyclopedia Britannica (1957 ed.) 325-327; 21 id., at 797; Archer, Faiths Men Live By (2d ed. revised by Purinton), 120-138, 254-313; 1961 World Almanac 695, 712; Year Book of American Churches for 1961, at 29, 47.

It is important to note that this citation of Secular Humanism as a religion is not merely dictum. The Supreme Court refers to the important 1957 case of Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia (101 U.S. App. D.C. 371) in its holding that Secular Humanism is a non-theistic religion within the meaning of the First Amendment.

The Ethical Culture movement is one denomination of Secular Humanism which reaches moral and cultural relativism, situation ethics, and attacks belief in a spiritual God and theistic values of the Old and New Testaments.

The Washington Ethical Society case involved denial of the Society's application for tax exemption as a religious organization. The U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court's ruling, defined the Society as a religious organization, and granted its tax exemption.

The Court Stated: The sole issue raised is whether petitioner falls within the definition of a "church" or a "religious society" . . . . The taxing authority urges denial of the tax exemption asserting petitioner is not a religious society or church and that it does not use its buildings for religious worship since "religious" and "worship" require a belief in and teaching of a Supreme Being who controls the universe. The position of the tax Court, in denying tax exemption, was that belief in and teaching of the existence of a Divinity is essential to qualify under the statute. . . . To construe exemptions so strictly that unorthodox or minority forms of worship would be denied the exemption benefits granted to those conforming to the majority beliefs might well raise constitutional issues . . . . We hold on this record and under the controlling statutory language petitioner qualifies as "a religious corporation or society" . . . .

It is incumbent upon Congress to utilize this broad definition of religion in all its legislative actions bearing on the support or non-support of religion, within the context of the "no-establishment" clause of the First Amendment.


Other Justices have reflected back on the Torcaso opinion and confirmed our analysis.

Justice Scalia wrote:In Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 495, n. 11 (1961), we did indeed refer to "SECULAR HUMANISM" as a "religio[n]." Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) note 6

Justice Harlan summed it all up: [Footnote 8] This Court has taken notice of the fact that recognized "religions" exist that "do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God," Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 495 n. 11, e. g., "Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, SECULAR HUMANISM and others." Ibid. See also Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 371, 249 F.2d 127 (1957); 2 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 293; J. Archer, Faiths Men Live By 120-138, 254-313 (2d ed. revised by Purinton 1958); Stokes & Pfeffer, supra, n. 3, at 560. Welsh v. United States 398 U.S. 333 (1970) note 8

But many who favor a secularist "separation of church and state" will contend that fundamentalists invented the idea that Humanism is a religion. Like most Americans, these secularists do not understand the legal issues involved here.

The Humanist-dominated Court is permitting Secular Humanists to have their cake and eat it too.

Secular Humanism is a religion "for Free Exercise Clause purposes."

The Court has undeniably defined Secular Humanism as a religion "for free exercise purposes." When Secular Humanists want the benefits of a religion, they get them.

Tax Exemption.
Secular Humanism has been granted tax-exempt status as a religion. The Torcaso quote cited the cases.

Conscientious Objection.
Even though Congress originally granted conscientious objector status only to those who objected to war for religious reasons (i.e., because of a belief in God), the Supreme Court turned around and said that Humanists who don't believe in God are "religious" for C.O. purposes. U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 183, 85 S.Ct. 850, 13 L.Ed.2d 733, 746 (Holding that belief in a "Supreme Being" is not a necessary component of "religion," quoting a Secular Humanist source, "Thus the 'God' that we love . . . is . . . humanity.")
So Secular Humanism is emphatically and undeniably a religion -- "for free exercise purposes."
Any claim that "the clear weight of the caselaw" is against the proposition that Secular Humanism is a religion  is a misleading claim. Secular Humanism is a religion ("for free exercise clause purposes").

Secular Humanism is Not a religion "for Establishment Clause purposes."

But when Christians attempt to get the religion of Secular Humanism out of the government schools, based on the same emotional frame of mind which atheists had when they went to court against God in schools, then pro-secularist courts speak out of the other side of their faces and say that Secular Humanism is NOT a religion "for establishment clause purposes." This is slimy deceitful legalism at its worst.

But it explains why so many are confused about whether Secular Humanism is a religion.

Here is the rule: When Secular Humanists want the benefits of religion, Secular Humanism is a religion. When Secular Humanists are challenged for propagating their religion in public schools, it is not a religion. If that sounds insane, it is; but all insane people are still rational. This insanity is cloaked in the rational-sounding rhetoric of constitutional law. Remember:

Secular Humanism is a religion "for free exercise clause purposes," and it is not a religion "for establishment clause purposes."

Here's how it works. In Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School Dist., 37 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1994), a high school biology teacher tried to balance the teaching of evolutionism with creationism based on the claim that Secular Humanism (and its core belief, evolutionism) is a religion. The court emphatically rejected this claim:

We reject this claim because neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit, has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are "religions" for Establishment Clause purposes. Indeed, both the dictionary definition of religion and the clear weight of the caselaw5 are to the contrary. The Supreme Court has held unequivocally that while the belief in a divine creator of the universe is a religious belief, the scientific theory that higher forms of life evolved from lower forms is not. Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 107 S.Ct. 2573, 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987) (holding unconstitutional, under Establishment Clause, Louisiana's "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction Act").

Note 5: See Smith v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County, 827 F.2d 684, 690-95 (11th Cir. 1987) (refusing to adopt district court's holding that "secular humanism" is a religion for Establishment Clause purposes; deciding case on other grounds); United States v. Allen, 760 F.2d 447, 450-51 (2d Cir. 1985) (quoting Tribe, American Constitutional Law 827-28 (1978), for the proposition that, while "religion" should be broadly interpreted for Free Exercise Clause purposes, "anything `arguably non-religious' should not be considered religious in applying the establishment clause").

Thus a teacher who wants to tell his students about his religious beliefs is free to do so if his religion is the religion of Secular Humanism, but may not tell his students about his religious beliefs if his religion is Christianity. Christians are not even allowed to discuss Christianity with students during lunch break, while Secular Humanists are allowed to teach the tenets of the religion of Secular Humanism from the blackboard during class.

Peloza alleges the school district ordered him to refrain from discussing his religious beliefs with students during "instructional time," and to tell any students who attempted to initiate such conversations with him to consult their parents or clergy. He claims the school district, in the following official reprimand, defined "instructional time" as any time the students are on campus, including lunch break and the time before, between, and after classes:

You are hereby directed to refrain from any attempt to convert students to Christianity or initiating conversations about your religious beliefs during instructional time, which the District believes includes any time students are required to be on campus as well as the time students immediately arrive for the purposes of attending school for instruction, lunch time, and the time immediately prior to students' departure after the instructional day.

Complaint at 16. Peloza seeks a declaration that this definition of instructional time is too broad, and that he should be allowed to participate in student-initiated discussions of religious matters when he is not actually teaching class.

The school district's interest in avoiding an Establishment Clause violation trumps Peloza's right to free speech.

While at the high school, whether he is in the classroom or outside of it during contract time, Peloza is not just any ordinary citizen. He is a teacher. He is one of those especially respected persons chosen to teach in the high school's classroom. He is clothed with the mantle of one who imparts knowledge and wisdom. His expressions of opinion are all the more believable because he is a teacher. The likelihood of high school students equating his views with those of the school is substantial. To permit him to discuss his religious beliefs with students during school time on school grounds would violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Such speech would not have a secular purpose, would have the primary effect of advancing religion, and would entangle the school with religion. In sum, it would flunk all three parts of the test articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 91 S.Ct. 2105, 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971). See Roberts v. Madigan, 921 F.2d 1047, 1056-58 (10th Cir. 1990) (teacher could be prohibited from reading Bible during silent reading period, and from stocking two books on Christianity on shelves, because these things could leave students with the impression that Christianity was officially sanctioned), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 3025, 120 L.Ed.2d 896 (1992).
Secular Humanist teachers and school administrators (who are protected by the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment as members of tax-exempt religious organizations and religious conscientious objectors) are free to propagate their views in schools, but Christians are not. If Christians propagate their views, it is an "establishment clause" violation, but not if Secular Humanists propagate their views.
Secular Humanism is a religion "for free exercise clause purposes," and it is not a religion "for establishment clause purposes.""
  1. Fact: Supreme court conscientious objection cases in 1965 and 1970 is shown may exist in a person/possessor a “sense of things as in true, correct” that equates in similar regard as a "Supreme Being as in true, correct” outside of a traditional religion, still amounts to religion. “A sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God” U.S. v Seeqer 380 U.S. 162,176 (1965) and Welsh v. U.S.398 U.S. 333 (1970).

  2. Fact: The courts concluded humanism is a secular religion. The U.S. Supreme Court in the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins (367 U.S. 488) refers to the 1957 case of Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia (101 U.S. App. D.C. 371) in its holding that Secular Humanism is a non-theistic religion within the meaning of the First Amendment

  3. Fact: The courts concluded the "Theory of Evolution" isn't a secular religion even though its a tenet of the secular religion of humanism, on the false assumption, basis that the theory of evolution is unbiased science. Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School Dist., 37 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1994), Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 107 S.Ct. 2573, 96 L.Ed.2d 510 (1987)

  4. Fact: The "theory of Evolution" may have some scientific bells and whistles that it seemingly appears to be legitimate science, but it lacks one thing an unbiased panel of judges.

  5. Fact: The US SUPREME court failed to take into account evidence their assumption that evolution is unbiased science is flawed, being the "Theory of Evolution" was introduced on government universities and colleges where exist- extreme bias, having major conflicts of interest, deceitfulness, bigotry --  in a stacked deck of open professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors, scientist and administration.

  1. Professors, scientist and administration coveted POLITICAL POWER and WEALTH in prominence, name recognition, as individuals, as a group, job protection, increased salaries, tenure, increased pensions, chased lucrative government research grants, combined with similar bias scientist, and journals, resulted in atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science.
  2. They created as many possible atheistic and infidel philosophy adherents and an muti-billion dollar industry of jobs involving the "Theory of Evolution" in government academia, in many other branches of government such as k-12, museums, and in the private sector such as movies, numerous documentaries, and thousands of books.
  3. All combined became an extremely bias panel of judges that bullied/bigotry forced the "Theory of Evolution" to be taught as true/fact and to continued being taught as true/fact.
  4. All due to the unconstitutional, unchecked power of Big Government Academia, 1800 government Universities and Colleges.
  1. Fact: The "theory of evolution" is merely atheistic and morphed infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group combined with similar bias scientist, journals derived junk science.

  2. Fact: Even though overwhelming evidence shows "Evolution" to be atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science, it is instead deceitfully portrayed as unbiased science having a God, Supreme being effect is perceived as true and correct where millions believe in and direct their every aspect of life equivalent to the Judeo-Christian religion groups; which constitutes and fits the defined principle by the United States Supreme court as a secular religion.

  3. Fact: When a government institution employee teaches the "Theory of Evolution" is true/fact, its a reflection, extension of Congress in its government bureaucracy of government schools had made law respecting the "Theory of Evolution" is true/fact.

  4. Fact: The "Theory of Evolution" began to be unconstitutionally taught as "fact" in public K-12, where 9 out of 10 children in America are coerced to attend in effect a monopoly, also unconstitutional.

  5. Fact: Their is no human experiment, tool, device, finding in the field, exhibit prop or illustration could prove without a doubt the theory of Evolution is true/fact.

  6. Fact: There can never be achieved anywhere in elected government, its bureaucracy or even outside of government a totally unbiased panel, or judge to determine the "Theory of Evolution" is true/fact.

  7. Fact: Any employee of a government university or any other government institution that teaches the "Theory of Evolution" is true/fact, is nothing more then teaching - atheistic and infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group, and similar bias scientist, journals derived junk science -, is a sham and scam played on American citizens to rob us of our tax dollars in the trillions, rob us of our our full measure of constitutional political power/influence individually and as groups outside of government, rob us of our tradition religion Christianity, rob us of our nation's Judeo-Christian principled heritage society and rob us of our Judeo-Christian heritage principled government.

  8. Fact: The evidence allows for only teaching "The theory of Evolution" as solely a theory would be constitutional, and that is only when "Intelligent Design" was also taught as a theory is also constitutional.

  9. Fact: However, since it is obvious that the "theory of Evolution" will be given an undue advantage over the "theory of Intelligent Design", in the government school system with an atheistic and morphed infidel philosophy lopsided leaning tenured professors/teachers, administrations and similar bias scientist, journals will inevitably not give the "theory of intelligent design" a fair objective presentation, so neither theory can be taught by any government employee or institution. Only would be allowed to be taught by any non government group on the outside of government through private means/funding only, be allowed access to government funded academia and public schools K-12 to present a case for either the "Theory of Evolution" or the theory of "Intelligent Design". There will be no more government grants for either teaching, or research on the "Theory of Evolution", which would also exclude the theory of "Intelligent Design". 

  10. Fact:  When the State University Atheistic, Infidel Secular Religion is officially recognized as a secular religion, then its followers, believers should not be granted conscientious objector status based upon:

  1. The Secular Religion origins is based on a factual State created fraud, would lend itself baseless the claim of conscious objector status.
  2. The state can't afford in the time of war, due to a massive State fraud, created millions to believe in a State Secular religion, to allow a mass exodus of soldiers, based upon a conscientious objector status.
  1. 1879 Infidel philosophy psychology - based on atheistic world view: (Late 1800's onward) 
  1. Constitutional Principled Argument: The State Left Neutrality and Began to Respect Human Behavior Group/Establishment

  1. Fact: In 1991, I had studied the bible for seven years since 1984, using a 100 year old resource called the Strong's concordance written and researched by over 100 biblical scholars; specifically use for identifying the usages (definitions) of words in biblical times. In my biblical research, had identified the word "spirit" in the Strongs' concordance that rendered its usage in biblical times as "mental disposition".

  2. Fact: 1984 edition Strong’s Concordance 4151: spirit = mental disposition, etc spirit, spiritual, spiritually, mind.

  3. Fact: In the bible the words "spirit, spiritual and spiritually" were use for thousands years for identifying the "mental disposition" in people, the same, equivalent and predates by thousands of years, the modern day words "Psychology, psychological and psychologically".

  4. Fact: The bible is not merely one book, but a library of of 66 books by over 40 authors crossing a large span of time, the bible having worldly logic and knowledge (secular information) at times independent/separated or combined at times with supernatural logic and knowledge (non-secular information). 

  5. Fact: Particularly the book of "Proverbs" contained in the bible, written in the tenth century B.C., among other books in the bible is in effect is a large source of in the field observational findings of both animal and human behavior, both lower and higher order of human behavior, to establish, define, predict and manipulate many secular aspects of human behavior to obtain beneficial secular results.

  6. Fact: Precedent USA Supreme court cases recognizes the separation of secular from non-secular information content in the bible, School District of Abington Twp.v.Schempp, 374 U.S. 374 U.S.203,225 (1963) Wwiley v. Franklin, 475 F. Supp. 390 (D. Tex 1910).

  7. Fact: A strong persuasive constitutional argument case can be made, the establishment of psychology and the establishments of traditional religion particular those who follow the bible, are both human behavior groups offering worldly logic and knowledge (secular information) and that for Congress/government to respect/ favor one over the other (with exception to the Judeo-Christian principled heritage of the nation) is unconstitutional, violates the premise and intent of the First Amendment Establishment Clause.

  1. (1879) Psychology Philosophy (University of Leipzig, Germany the first psychology laboratory)

  2. Fact: Around 1991 in my research at the University of Buffalo library, I sense had found a smoking gun, evidence in some research papers by Psychology researchers, their dismay of their own findings, evidence that shows the human behavior group in the establishment of psychology exhibited as a whole laboratory ineffectiveness, unreplicatiablity, bias, faddish, fraud and merely subjective in effect junk science.

  1. Laboratory Ineffectiveness = "...the laboratory is often ineffective because much human behavior is so sensitive to incidental sources of stimulation, that adequate control wouldn’t be achieved” -Psychological Research Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst. (1981)-

  2. Unreplicatible = "There is no more fundamental requirement in science that the replicability of findings be established. Yet, in psychology few replication studies are attempted, and of these only a small proportion are published ( see N. C. Smith, 1970, for a more extensive discussion of this issue and for other arguments that experimental method as normally practiced has serious limitations).", "Perhaps the most important reason for the widespread belief in the replicability of psychological experiments in the absence of replicability is that experimentalist often fail to distinguish between concurrent and temporal reliability." -Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst.-

  3. Bias = "Some journals state that they do not accept replication studies, and others cast doubt on accepted conclusions." -Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst.-

  4. Faddish = "As Greenwald (1975) has observed, findings in psychology often have a faddish quality about them. At one point, studies that support a particular phenomenon are favored, and at another point, studies that refute the phenomenon are favored." -Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst.-

  5. Fraud = "Moreover, for the person who makes no attempt to replicate his or her own findings, there is little danger that others will demonstrate that the findings are unreplicatable because in the rare event that the replication is undertaken by someone else, discrepant results can almost always be dismissed as the result of minor procedural differences.-Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst.-" "Typically there is not sufficient detail for readers to fully reconstruct what was done in a particular experiment, especially given the lack of agreement within psychology about the methods to be used." -The Needs of Other J.M. Innes, University of Adelaide South Australia-

  1. Fact: I also notice around 1991, an article titled "Are Universities Biased in Favor of Liberal Faculties?" in the Buffalo Newspaper by Hans Tirpak, Director, Law Student Bar Association, university of Buffalo, Amherst (1991). The article pointed out some valid observations of "extreme bias" on government universities and colleges, are dominated by leftest professors and administration and pertinent Supreme court case law that defined a Secular Religion.

  1. (Buffalo Newspaper 1991 Testimonial Evidence) Government Universities Preferred Hiring Awarding Tenure to Liberal Professors, Overall Leftest Bias Dominate: "...colleges and universities have been and are in the practice of hiring and awarding tenure to liberal professors over equally qualified conservative professors,..", “...the growing awareness that most of America’s colleges and universities, including UB (university of Buffalo), have become dominated by leftist professors and administrators strongly support the inference.", "It might be stretching things a bit to assert that UB and/or similarly situation colleges or  universities do not hire conservative professors. I hear UB has some in it’s political science department. I even met one about a year ago. I was quite surprised. With that exception, every professor I have met at UB in the 2 1/2 years I’ve been a student has seemed leftist" - Hans Tirpak, Director, Law Student Bar Association, university of Buffalo, Amherst (1991)

  2. Fact: Precedent U.S Supreme Court cases that reveal types of known secular religions in existence and identifies the particular element that constitutes a secular religion in  “A sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God” in 1961, 1965 and 1970. 

  1. Fact: Additional evidence - extreme bias:

  1. (2009) Evidence of Bias Against Men and Boys in Mental Health Research (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKXVcUSBKH4 "We have all grown to trust "research" and when we hear that a study shows that "X is correct" we tend to automatically believe that "X" is correct. Research has taken on an almost divine ethos that carries the seal of approval of correctness. If science says it, it must be so. The problem of course is that science, especially social science, is less than concrete and is much more slippery than measuring a distance or the tensile strength of a bar of steel. Mental health research is much more vulnerable to values and ideologies of the researchers. If a scientist believes a certain thing it usually has little impact on his measurements of the tensile strength of the bar of steel. No matter what he believes the measurement will likely be the same. But what about issues in social sciences where researchers come to the table with a large amount of preconceived ideas, allegiances to ideologies that espouse strong opinions about those being studied or have traumatic life histories that bias them against certain groups? Can those sorts of things influence the "findings" of a social science study? You bet they can. Gone is the impartial judge weighing the evidence and sifting through the data to find the truth. In today's world of social science research the opposite is happening: researchers are starting at their pre-conceived bias's and then designing research to prove that bias...."

  1. Fact: An universal code, principle of conduct concerning a conflict of interest in any type of judge over any matter, can be obtained in 28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;


  1. Fact: (2012 -The Washington Times- Evidence ) Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/1/liberal-majority-on-campus-yes-were-biased/

  • "...surveyed a roughly representative sample of academics and scholars in social psychology and found that “In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists admit that they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues.”
  • "...80 percent of psychology professors at elite and non-elite universities are Democrats."
  • "...90 percent identified as liberal and only 4 percent as conservative."
  • Fact: (2015) Study delivers bleak verdict on validity of psychology experiment results https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results "In the investigation, a whopping 75% of the social psychology experiments were not replicated, meaning that the originally reported findings vanished when other scientists repeated the experiments. Half of the cognitive psychology studies failed the same test.", "Even when scientists could replicate original findings, the sizes of the effects they found were on average half as big as reported first time around."
  1. Fact: (2013 Article by Deathbytrolly Evidence) Why many professors are atheists: Academe as a secular religious community https://deathbytrolley.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/why-many-career-academics-are-atheists-academe-as-asecular-religious-community/ "The university campus is akin to something between a big church or a small Vatican. Frequently comprised of a mixture of historic classical architecture harkening back to a nobler, more charming past, and modern state-of-the-art research and educational facilities, universities are made to impress and dazzle. This grandiosity is enhanced by rich use of symbology: regal coats of arms, robes, idealistic ancient Latin and Greek inscriptions, massive painted portraits of esteemed former Presidents and eminent scholars, and the ivy, it’s hard to get over the ivy!"

  2. Fact: (2014 - Inside Higher ED - Evidence) Retaliation Claim Vindicated "Seven years after Mike Adams sued the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, charging that he was denied a promotion because of his political views, a federal jury agreed" https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/03/21/jury-backs-claim-conservative-professor-he-was-denied-promotion-because-his-views "Adams sued in 2007 after being denied a promotion to full professor of sociology. He cited emails and statements from faculty colleagues taking issue with his views, which are outspoken and conservative.The Adams case was of particular interest to many who charge political bias in the academy because he is a political (and religious) convert.  He presented evidence that his faculty colleagues liked him when he was an atheist Democrat, but started to have concerns when he became a Christian Republican."

  3. 2015 Exposed: Christian Students Rejected, Failed, and Expelled for their Faith by State Universities http://www.redstate.com/matthewclark/2015/07/13/exposed-christian-students-rejected-failed-expelled-faith-state-colleges-universities/ "Public colleges and universities are taking the gloves off when it comes to Christian students on their campuses. Gone are the days of surreptitious slights against Christians; now it is open season on faith.  Blatant, in-your-face anti-Christian discrimination is the new norm. Christian students now face their applications being rejected because they let it slip out that they are a person of faith, receiving failing grades for daring to allow their religious beliefs to outweigh the omniscience of the educational elites, or being outright expelled for having the audacity to live in accordance with their faith."

  1. Fact: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY needed one more deception up its sleeve in what I call a cloak to deceive:

  1. Fact: Much of human behavior (higher order) experimentation is not scientifically replicatable in a laboratory to meet the bar of science.

  2. Fact: Rudimentary animal and human behavior experimentation findings shown replicatablity meets the bar of a science

  3. Fact: The psychology establishment's cloak to deceive is made up of an aura of scientific respectability in their rudimentary animal and human behavior experimentation has replication barely meets the bar of science, that was used to cloak, to deceptively emit/associate a sense of scientific respectability onto higher order of human behavior that experimentation findings show is not scientifically replicatable, a classic shell game to deceive.

  1. Fact: The psychology establishment's cloak to deceive is made up of rudimentary animal and human behavior laboratory experimentation, is used to create a “sense of things/cloak” that covers higher order of human behavior teaching, training and counseling that is not scientifically replicatable in a laboratory; with an appearance of SCIENCE, combine the -extreme bias- atheistic and infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group, and similar extreme bias journals constitutes as JUNK SCIENCE, even so is as associated with TRUTH, CORRECTNESS evokes sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor in a place parallel/equivalent to that filled by a SUPREME BEING as associated with TRUTH AND CORRECTNESS, can be constitutionally persuasively argued meets the Supreme court's ruling that defines a religion (secular) U.S. v Seeqer 380 U.S. 162,176 (1965) and Welsh v. U.S.398 U.S. 333 (1970).

  2. Fact: Again it was a forgone conclusion science wasn't the main decided factor but the - extreme bias - among the 1800 government universities and colleges having a stacked deck of open professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors/scientists to teach and to continued being taught "psychology" as a "science".

  3. Fact: The psychology establishment has shown to exhibit as a whole:

  1. (2012 -The Washington Times- Evidence ) Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/1/liberal-majority-on-campus-yes-were-biased/
  2. 90 percent identified as liberal and only 4 percent as conservative."
  3. laboratory ineffectiveness due to human behavior is so sensitive to incidental sources of stimulation, that adequate control wouldn’t be achieved
  4. unreplicatiable, few replication studies are attempted, often fail to distinguish between concurrent and temporal reliability
  5. bias journals,
  6. faddish favoring at one point then disfavoring at another point,
  7. fraud little danger that others will demonstrate that the findings are unreplicatable, discrepant results can almost always be dismissed as the result of minor procedural differences
  8. merely subjective, In reality, a person is deviant if a society says they are
  9. The extremely bias liberal government academia, stacked deck of open professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors/scientists, and administration,
  10. (August 2015 Evidence) Study delivers bleak verdict on validity of psychology experiment results
  11. A cloak of rudimentary science to deceptively emit/associate a sense of scientific respectability onto higher order of human behavior that experimentation shows non replicatiablity,
  12. When shows some higher order of human behavior replicatablity must be deemed temporary due to the changing society norms and values impact on individuals and society
  13. The atheistic and infidel philosophy state secular religion due to being in all government Universities/Colleges, all government 100,000 elementary/secondary schools 9 out of 10 children attend (unconstitutional monopoly), all government jails, all government hospitals, all government Courts and all government protective services is a major contributing impact on individuals and society which is now tainting their so called observations, the driving force of human behavior manifestation in experimental results.
  1. Fact: You end up with a smoke and mirrors, a mere appearance show of junk science that deceives, that bypasses the cautionary guard of many citizens and especially when it unconstitutionally bypasses the U.S. Constitutional First Amendment Establishment Clause Wall, in essence Congresses erroneously put their stamp of approval (billions of tax dollars) on it, when it is at most an atheistic secular religion.

  2. Fact: The establishment of psychology originated from infidel philosophy entered U.S. State universities in the 1890's afforded by rudimentary human behavior replicatablity having an aura of scientific respectability, obtained Government funding, publicity and prominence. While in govt had violated the Establishment clause of the First Amendment, transformed itself into a secular religion by an aura of scientific respectability in the use of the cloak onto higher order of human behavior experimentation that is non- replicatable is pawned to deceive and sold to Congresses and many citizens.

  3. Fact: When government/Congress had made law respecting one particular human behavior group (secular religion) in the establishment of psychology, over the establishments of Judeo-Christian human behavior groups (traditional religion) that uses secular information contained in the library of books called the bible, such as the bible's earlier terminologies "spirit, spiritual and spiritually" defining "mental disposition" and the bible's a large source of in effect, in the field observational findings of both animal and human, both lower and higher order of human behavior, it can be constitutionally persuasively argued that government/Congress in effect had violated indirectly and directly the core, primary, supreme premise, intent and principle of our Constitutional First Amendment Establishment Clause "Congress shall not make law respecting an establishment of religion"

  4. Fact: The establishment of psychology is in fact a State Atheistic Secular Religion that had unconstitutionally received respect from Congress (violation of Establishment Clause) over other human behavior groups particularly traditional religion.

  1.   1950's Infidel Philosophy psychiatry - based on atheistic world view:
  1. Equivalent God = God effect, so called -- expert, professional -- of human behavior, false mere appearance of truth and correctness, which automatically receives respect from Congress (violation of Establishment Clause) over other human behavior groups particularly traditional religion. Used a cloak in a mere use and appearance of methodologies of science to deceive Congress and the American people (Unconstitutional).
  1. (1900's) Psychiatry = Psychiatry morphed into constant inhuman, so called treatments:
  1. The History of Neuroleptics/psychiatric drugs (2008) Dr. Grace E. Jackson Affidavit http://psychrights.org/States/Alaska/CaseXX/3AN-08-493PS/JacksonOnNLtoxicity.pdf

    The modern history of psychiatric drugs dates back to the early 1950s, when derivatives of the synthetic dye and rocket fuel industries were found to have medicinal properties. Following World War II, a wide variety of compounds came to be tested in humans. The antihistamine known as chlorpromazine (Thorazine) is generally regarded as the first “anti-psychotic” drug, responsible for igniting the psychopharmacology revolution. As Thorazine grew in popularity, medications replaced neurosurgery and shock therapies as the favored treatments for the institutionalized mentally ill.

    When, in 1955, Drs. Jean Delay and Pierre Deniker coined the term “neuroleptic” to describe Thorazine, they identified five defining properties of this prototype: the gradual reduction of psychotic symptoms, the induction of psychic indifference, sedation, movement abnormalities (parkinsonism), and predominant subcortical effects.4 At its inception, Thorazine was celebrated as a chemical lobotomizer due to behavioral effects which paralleled those associated with the removal of brain tissue.5 As the concept of lobotomy fell into disfavor, the alleged antipsychotic features of the neuroleptics came to be emphasized. Ultimately, the two terms became synonymous. Ignorant of the historical definition of neuroleptics as chemical lobotomizers, members of the psychiatric profession have only rarely acknowledged the fact that these dopamine blocking compounds have been, and continue to be, a major cause of brain injury and dementia. Nevertheless, the emergence of improved technologies and epidemiological investigations have made it possible to demonstrate why these medications should be characterized as neurotoxins, rather than neurotherapies.'Biological' psychiatry has yet to validate a single psychiatric condition/diagnosis as an abnormality/disease, or as anything neurological, 'biological, 'chemically-imbalanced' or 'genetic'" (1998) Dr. Fred Baughman Jr. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Baughman Child Neurologist, Fellow of the American
  1. Biological' psychiatry has yet to validate a single psychiatric condition/diagnosis as an abnormality/disease, or as anything neurological, 'biological, 'chemically-imbalanced' or 'genetic'" (1998) Dr. Fred Baughman Jr. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Baughman Child Neurologist, Fellow of the American

  2. DSM where they have almost 400 so called mental disorders, basically new moral laws simply voted on at a convention, based on solely behaviorsm, so they can bill and rip off the government, you and me by the billions (Unconstitutional) (1952)  DSM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders, Equivalent Bible  http://www.alternet.org/personal-health/why-newest-psychiatric-diagnostic-bible-will-be-boon-big-pharma, moral laws = The DSM-5 is the New World Order, Atheist's Moral Code, the psychiatrist's Bible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10ZVZbm9e7c .
  1. First psych drug become known as a chemical lobotomy: (1994) The dark side of psychiatric drugs (USA Today Magazine) http://www.stopshrinks.org/reading_room/drugs/dark_side_1.htm "The major tranquilizers were able to create a zombie state, identical to that seen after a lobotomy, in a person whose brain remained intact. For this reason, Thorazine became known as a "chemical lobotomy."

  2. Later drugs hid negative study results, short term studies, sugar pills placebo have better results, major conflicts of interest with BIG PHARMA abound, and bribery involved

  3. (Early 1990's) Hillary Clinton attempted to have universal psychology, psychiatry (State Secular Religion) coverage in her health care plan

  4. (2007) Robert Whitaker Affidavit http://psychrights.org/Litigation/WhitakerAffidavit.pdf of evidence, a journalist writer about science and medicine, in a variety of forums for about 20 years.

  • They increase the likelihood that a person will become chronically ill.
  • They lead to early death (shorten by 25 years).
  • Drugs that were effective in curbing psychosis over the short term were making patients more likely to become psychotic over the long term.
  • The new “atypical” anti psychotics are not better than the old ones in terms of their safety and tolerability, and quality of life may even be worse on the new drugs than on the old ones.
  • Anti psychotics cause a host of debilitating physical, emotional and cognitive side effects:
  • Tardive dyskinesia,
  • Akathisia,
  • Emotional impairment,
  • and Cognitive impairment.
  • Other side effects of standard neuroleptics include an increased incidence of blindness,
  • fatal blood clots,
  • arrhythmia,
  • heat stroke,
  • swollen breasts,
  • leaking breasts,
  • obesity,
  • sexual dysfunction,
  • skin rashes and seizures,
  • and early death.
  • Schizophrenia patients now commit suicide at 20 times the rate they did prior to the use of neuroleptics.
  1. (2008) Dr. Grace E. Jackson Affidavit http://psychrights.org/States/Alaska/CaseXX/3AN-08-493PS/JacksonOnNLtoxicity.pdf evidence before the Supreme Court for the State of Alaska: 

1) postmortem studies of human brain tissue
2) neuroimaging studies of living humans
3) postmortem studies of lab animal brain tissue
4) biological markers of cell damage in living humans
5) lab studies of cell cultures/chemical systemsfollowing drug exposureneuroleptic therapy- significant tissue damage - black dots represent scar tissue
    • Creates scaring and neuronal loss,
    • shrinkage and/or loss of brain tissue,
    • significant reduction in the total brain weight and volume.
    • Increase the concentration of tTG (a marker of programmed cell death) in the central nervous system of living humans.
  1. ((2008) Dr. Grace E. Jackson Affidavit http://psychrights.org/States/Alaska/CaseXX/3AN-08-493PS/JacksonOnNLtoxicity.pdf Evidence before the Supreme Court for the State of Alaska: In 1977, Jellinger published his findings of neur opathological changes in the brain tissue of twenty-eight patients who had been exposed to neuroleptics for an average of four to five years. In most cases, the periods of drug treatment had been intermittent. . An example of the abnormalities is shown. This photo demonstrates reactive  gliosis (black dots  represent scar tissue) in the caudate of a patient who had received neuroleptic therapy. Patients in this study had received the following drug treatments: chlorpromazine (Thorazine), reserpine, haloperidol (Haldol), trifluoperazine (Stelazine), chlorprothixen (Taractan), thioridazine (Mellaril), tricyclic antidepressants, and/or minor tranquilizers.

  2. (1994) Studies documenting that long-term recovery rates are much higher for patients off antipsychotic medications (2008) Dr. Grace E. Jackson Affidavit http://psychrights.org/States/Alaska/CaseXX/3AN-08-493PS/JacksonOnNLtoxicity.pdf evidence before the Supreme Court for the State of Alaska: studies documenting that long-term recovery rates are much higher for patients off antipsychotic medications. In 1994, Courtenay Harding at Boston University reported on the long-term outcomes of 82 chronic schizophrenics discharged from Vermont State Hospital in the late 1950s. She found that one-third of this cohort had recovered completely, and that all who did shared one characteristic: They had all stopped taking antipsychotic medication.  The notion that schizophrenics needed to stay on antipsychotics all their lives was a “myth,” Harding said.In the World Health Organization studies, 63% of patients in the poor countries had good outcomes, and only one-third became chronically ill. In the U.S and other developed countries, only 37% of patients had good outcomes, and the remaining patients did not fare so well. In the undeveloped countries, only 16% of patients were regularly maintained on antipsychotics, versus 61% of patients in the developed countries.  In response to this body of literature, physicians in Switzerland, Sweden and Finland have developed programs that involve minimizing use of antipsychotic drugs, and they are reporting much better results than what we see in the United States.  In particular, Jako Seikkula recently reported that five years after initial diagnosis, 82% of his psychotic patients are symptom-free, 86% have returned to their  jobs or to school, and only 14% of his patients are on antipsychotic medications. This spring, researchers at the University of Illinois Medical School reported on the long-term outcomes of schizophrenia patients in the Chicago area since 1990. They found that 40% of those who refused to take their antipsychotic medications were recovered at five-year and 15-year follow up exams, versus five percent of the medicated patients

  3. Dr. David Healy Bio http://davidhealy.org/david-healy-bio/  is an internationally respected psychiatrist, psychopharmacologist, scientist, and author. (2014) Psychiatry Gone Astray,http://davidhealy.org/psychiatry-gone-astray/

  • A professor of Psychiatry in Wales
  • studied medicine in Dublin, and at Cambridge University.
  • a former Secretary of the British Association for Psychopharmacology
  • has authored more than 150 peer-reviewed articles, 200 other pieces, and 20 books, including The Antidepressant Era
  • The Creation of Psychopharmacology from Harvard University Press, The Psychopharmacologists Volumes 1-3 and Let Them Eat Prozac from New York University Press, and Mania from Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • David’s main areas of research are clinical trials in psychopharmacology, the history of psychopharmacology, and the impact of both trials and psychotropic drugs on our culture.
  • He has been involved as an expert witness in homicide and suicide trials involving psychotropic drugs, and in bringing problems with these drugs to the attention of American and British regulators, as well raising awareness of how pharmaceutical companies sell drugs by marketing diseases and co-opting academic opinion-leaders, ghost-writing their articles. 

"Our citizens would be far better off if we removed all the psychotropic drugs from the market, as doctors are unable to handle them. It is inescapable that their availability creates more harm than good. Psychiatrists should therefore do everything they can to treat as little as possible, in as short time as possible, or not at all, with psychotropic drugs."

  • Myth 1: Your disease is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain,
  • Myth 2: It’s no problem to stop treatment with antidepressants,
  • Myth 3: Psychotropic Drugs for Mental Illness are like Insulin for Diabetes,
  • Myth 4: Psychotropic drugs reduce the number of chronically ill patients,
  • Myth 5: Happy pills do not cause suicide in children and adolescents,
  • Myth 6: Happy pills have no side effects,
  • Myth 7: Happy pills are not addictive,
  • Myth 8: The prevalence of depression has increased a lot.
  • Myth 9: The main problem is not over treatment, but under treatment,
  • Myth 10: Antipsychotics prevent brain damage"
  1. Psychiatry drugs thousands of horror stories, SSRI Stories Antidepressant Nightmares documented http://ssristories.net/archive/indexb6a1.html?sort=date&p=

  2. School Shootings http://ssristories.net/archive/index6450.html?p=school

  3. 6,000.000 Public teachers become as referral agents towards their students for Big Pharma, Psychiatry dangerous drugs, based on the fraudulent claim of Chemical Imbalance.

  4. 60 Minutes Does Chemical Imbalance Cause Depression? (video) http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/does-a-chemical-imbalance-cause-depression/

  5. 60 Minutes Treating Depression: Is there a placebo effect? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/treating-depression-is-there-a-placebo-effect/

  6. (2008 PBS) The Medicated Child (video) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/medicatedchild/

  7. (2008) Congress snuck in a rider to the TARP legislation to guarantee the State Secular religion passage that insurance companies to also pay for a secular religion establishment of Psychology's counseling, psychiatry drugging comparable in cost amount as to physical illnesses.

  8. A large number of psychiatrists are dishonest, because I see them giving people drugs that they know are brain damaging therapeutics, that they know do not have positive, long-term outcomes, that they know will not cure anything. They just take a list of symptoms and call it a mental illness or disorder.", "Children are given fake diagnosis left and right and put on mind altering drugs with suicidal side effects. Psychiatrists can diagnose mental illness today without any scientific proof. No blood tests, urine tests, or PET scans are required. The result is millions of children are labeled and stuck on these drugs, trapped in a culture of hopelessness." (2009) Ex Pharmaceutical Sales Representative Comes Clean, Reveals Horrors of Western Medicine  (Video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTMg6vWIoLM "

  9. Pharmaceutical companies want to keep people sick. They want to make others think that they are sick. And they do this for one reason: money. Did you know: * Pharmaceutical companies invest more than 35,000 Euro (over $50,000) per physician each year to get them to prescribe their products? * More than 75 percent of leading scientists in the field of medicine are "paid for" by the pharmaceutical industry? * Corruption prevailed in the approval and marketing of drugs in some cases? * Illnesses are made up by the pharmaceutical industry and specifically marketed to enhance sales and market shares for the companies in question? * Pharmaceutical companies increasingly target children? (2010) Side Effects: Death. Confessions of a Pharma-Insider http://www.amazon.com/Side-Effects-Death-Confessions-Pharma-Insider/dp/1602645167 "I bribed a Swedish professor to enhance the registration of Prozac in Sweden." -John Virapen  "Side Effects: Death" is the true story of corruption, bribery and fraud written by Dr. John Virapen, who has been called THE Big Pharma Insider. During his 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry internationally (most notably as general manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden), Virapen was responsible for the marketing of several drugs, all of them with side effects. Now, Virapen is coming clean and telling all of the little secrets you were never intended to know

  10. (2012) Evidence There Is No Such Thing as Mental Illness - Stefan Molyneux- (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOScYBwMyAA

  11. The public mental health system is creating a huge class of chronic mental patients through forcing them to take ineffective, yet extremely harmful drugs Jim Gottstein Psych Rights Law Project for Psychiatric Rights http://psychrights.org/index.htm (PsychRights) is a non-profit, public interest law firm whose mission is to mount a  strategic legal campaign http://psychrights.org/Education/Alternatives05/RoleofLitigation.pdf against forced psychiatric drugging and electroshock in the United States akin to what Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP mounted in the 40's and 50's on behalf of African American civil rights.  http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/NLPs/neuroleptics.htm "Currently, due to the massive growth in psychiatric drugging of children and youth and the current targeting of them for even more psychiatric drugging, PsychRights has made attacking this problem a priority.  Children are virtually always forced to take these drugs because it is the adults in their lives who are making the decision.  This is an unfolding national tragedy of immense proportions.  As part of its mission, PsychRights is further dedicated to exposing the truth about these drugs and the courts being misled into ordering people to be drugged and subjected to other brain and body damaging interventions against their will."

  12. Neuroleptics http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/NLPs/neuroleptics.htm#General

  13. GlaxoSmithKline: GUILTY in Largest Health Fraud Settlement in US History 3 billion (2012) http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/16/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty.aspx

  14. Big Pharma’s Big Fines (2009 -2013) http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/bigpharma

  15. TED TALKS: Ben Goldacre: What doctors don't know about the drugs they prescribe (2012) (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKmxL8VYy0M

  16. Bad Pharma: Drug research riddled with half truths, omissions, lies (Jan 27, 2013) http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/bad_pharma_drug_research_riddled_with_half_truths_omissions_lies/

  17. (2013) Grand Total  0-17 Years - 8,389,034 of 74,500,000 (USA) are on psychiatric drugs Breakdown:(2013) Number of Children & Adolescents Taking Psychiatric Drugs in the U.S., http://www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-drugs/children-on-psychiatric-drugs/  

    0-1 Years                274,804
    2-3 Years                370,778
    4-5 Years                500,948
    6-12 Years               4,130,340
    13-17 Years             3,617,593

  18. (2013) Over 274,000 infants (0-1 year olds) and some 370,000 toddlers (1-3 years age) in the U.S. were on anti anxiety (e.g. Xanax) and antidepressant (e.g. Prozac) drugs. This report also found over 1,400 infants were on ADHD drugs." -The Wall Street Journal"-"An analysis of 2013 IMS Data http://www.cchrint.org/2014/05/21/10000-toddlers-on-adhd-drugs-tip-of-the-iceberg/ , Over 274,000 infants (0-1 year olds) and some 370,000 toddlers (1-3 years age) in the U.S. were on anti anxiety (e.g. Xanax) and antidepressant (e.g. Prozac) drugs. This report also found over 1,400 infants were on ADHD drugs." -The Wall Street Journal"- 

  1. (2014) Hillary care is now Obama care, on heath care.gov has a psychology, psychiatry drugging (State Secular Religion) coverage. https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/mental-health-substance-abuse-coverage/

  2. (Feb 2015) Why Are So Many Toddlers Taking Psychiatric Drugs? Prozac for babies?

  3. (March 2015) Senate panel examines why California foster care system 'addicted' to psychiatric drugs http://www.paradisepost.com/general-news/20150317/senate-panel-examines-why-california-foster-care-system-addicted-to-psychiatric-drugs

  1. Most psychiatric drugs can cause withdrawal reactions, sometimes including life-threatening emotional and physical withdrawal problems. In short, it is not only dangerous to start taking psychiatric drugs, it can also be dangerous to stop them.

  2. (2014) GlaxoSmithKline Fined $488.8M for 'Massive Bribery Network' http://abcnews.go.com/International/glaxosmithkline-gsk-fined-4888-million-massive-bribery-network/story?id=25624684

  3. Ablechild.org Parents for label and drug free education,  http://ablechild.org/

  4. Mindfreedom Win human rights in the mental heath system http://www.mindfreedom.org/

  5. Congress, the establishment of psychology plays both sides of the political aisle to assure their unconstitutional Congress's respect, so it won't be halted by the establishment wall of separation.The establishment of psychology and particularly psychiatry spends a large amount of lobby funds that enters the pockets on both sides of the political aisle of Congress, and billions in advertising for the national media that silences the national news media from exposing their bread and butter.

  • "The top twenty pharmaceutical companies and their two trade groups, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PHRMA) and Biotechnology Industry Organization, lobbied on at least 1,600 pieces of legislation between 1998 and 2004. According to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, pharmaceutical companies spent $900 million on lobbying between 1998 and 2005, more than any other industry. During the same period, they donated $89.9 million to federal candidates and political parties, giving approximately three times as much to Republicans as to Democrats.[1] According to the Center for Public Integrity, from January 2005 through June 2006 alone, the pharmaceutical industry spent approximately $182 million on Federal lobbying.[2] The industry has 1,274 registered lobbyists in Washington D.C." Wikipedia.org Political influence, Pharmaceutical lobby in the U.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmaceutical_lobby
  1. Our nation's Constitution was as if sold down the river for perhaps decades more of continual violation of the Establishment Clause. The Supreme Court failed to upheld the Constitution, has sadly permitted the continued breach of the primary most important principle, the corner stone of the our constitution in the Establishment Clause that supports and holds together the frame work of rights to all citizens.

  2. Forced Drugging Defense Package http://www.mindfreedom.org/campaign/shield/forced-drug-defense-pkg/defense-package

  3. Fact: Even though overwhelming evidence shows "Psychiatry" to be atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science, it is instead deceitfully portrayed as unbiased science having a God, Supreme being effect is perceived as true and correct where millions believe in and direct their every aspect of life equivalent to the Judeo-Christian religion groups; which constitutes and fits the defined principle by the United States Supreme court as a secular religion.
  1. Psychs in Hot WATER http://www.psychsearch.net/category/news/ http://www.psychsearch.net/category/news/


Section III

  1. 1978, 12 years old John Jerome Nowak's observations and conclusions of marriage
  2. The historical biblical concept of "One Flesh Marriage":
  3. Diminished comprehension and practice of the historical biblical concept of  "One Flesh Marriage", due to the so called Catholic group and other religious groups placing stumbling blocks/barriers in the minds of their subjects down through the centuries:
  4. (Early 1900's) Morphed-Infidelism taken over a number of protestant institutions, churches, colleges and seminaries using the "inclusivist strategy":
  5. (Early 1970's onward) State Secular Religion of Morphed-Infidelism attacked the concept of "one Flesh Marriage", that was a substantial controlling effect in the premeditated murder of over 60,000,000 CGHL/babies/future citizen:
1978, 12 years old John Jerome Nowak observations and conclusions of marriage

Hello, my name is John Jerome Nowak. There are two primary questions that sum up my life and quest that began at 12 years old.

At 12 years old, through a visual and immediate perceiving, I came to a conclusion, and tried to live my life accordingly.

When twelve years old, during lunch recess at school, I stood on the grass facing about 30 ft away from a very large old sycamore tree. The tree's trunk was about three to four feet in diameter. I recollected from observing the world, and my older brother and his friends were forever after the quest of having sexual relations. I began to visualize within my mind for a brief moment, right of the large tree, a youthful couple, as if floating, about three feet in the air. I envisioned both
male and female were a virgin, when had sexual intercourse unknowingly to others. Feeling at first discomfort, then immediately a sense of ease, comfort came over me. God had naturally joined them together. God had bound them in a lifetime marriage.

I visulaized as if Catholic Priest were standing behind the large tree as if upon the narrow and wide sidewalk connected, as if looking down on me and looking down on God who sees men and woman in marriage.

As I stood there, thought of another person who wasn't a virgin due to sexual intercourse with one or more that were already in their own lifetime marriages from having sexual intercourse unknowingly to others. The person who's no longer a virgin can't be bound to someone who's already in a lifetime marriage, and is free to take one who isn't in a lifetime marriage for their own lifetime marriage. Life time marriages can't be dissolved by sex with another, but only by physical death.

I then imagined a man who left his lifetime marriage that was unknown to others, and took another of someone else’s lifetime marriage. I sensed discomfort that he was proud. God sees all things and will hold him accountable.

Next, I perceived lifetime marriages, even when occurred unknown to others, when the male and female were equally virgins, had a lasting remembrance of giving to each other their virginity. This remembrance supplies the greatest potential of devotion for each other for a lifetime, for the greatest potential of contentment, peace and tranquility for the largest number of people in the world.

In contrast, I perceived the existing mentality in the world and in the Roman Catholic Church, when particularly two virgins, male and female, had sexual intercourse unknown to others, that if the relationship broke off, were regarded as either not a big deal by the world, or called a sin (fornication) by the Catholic teaching. To conveniently leave each other in error, thinking they're doing the will of God in leaving each other. I imagined the mentality of the world and the Catholic doctrine were the underlying reason for the great chaos happening in the world. I didn't linger on, especially the latter thoughts, lest I be tempted and fall into such situations, making it the more difficult at times to recall them, and because it was part visual within and immediate perceiving, was besides, difficult to ever express them.

I then looked toward the left side, directly behind the sycamore tree, at the narrow sidewalk beside a separate two story dark brick building, was a convent for nuns. I pictured in my mind, a couple, among others, on the narrow sidewalk, in their marriages like my parents, thinking there were some differences between my parent's relationship lasting, compared to this generation's relationships failing.

Then I stood to the right of the large sycamore tree where I imagined the couple was floating in a lifetime marriage by God. I looked forward a few feet where the narrow sidewalk became broader, parallel up to the multiple steel, windowless, closed, emergency doors on the back side of a smaller section of the school. I focused on the doors, where immediately inside, about ten feet, was the door to the girl’s bathroom, and immediately to the left, the door to the boy’s bathroom. The emergency doors were forbidden to be opened, to walk outside. Only few dared to open. I sensed a strange feeling, as if it was staged around me, perhaps by God, that there was some kind of meaning to the doors that were only to be open for emergencies. In later years the meaning came to me, that many lives, their sexual past, must be open and talked about, to reveal if they are married in God's eyes, to someone in their past.


Historical biblical concept of "One Flesh Marriage" basis of shot gun marriages. Beginning at 18 years old I began researching the bible to determine what I thought at 12 years old can be verifiable, these are the facts I found.

  1. Fact: Two highly acclaimed historical witnesses, Moses had implied, stipulated in law and the second witness Jesus of Nazareth referred to himself as a son of man, confirmed and stipulated in his words, command, the new law for his kingdom the church, at the moment of one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) known or even unknown to others, implied marriage occurs only, and Jesus establishes the second part of the new law of marriage “let not man separate”.

  2. Fact: Moses wrote the concept – one flesh – marriage written into the book Genesis 3,500 years ago: Genesis 2 :24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and cleave to his woman; and they shall become one flesh.

  3. Fact: Moses the same author SPECIFIED THE FULL EXTENT OF THE MEANING of “One flesh” marriage in his written law for civil peace and harmony, when a man entices a virgin female to become one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) unknown to others, implied establishes a marriage: Exodus 22:16 And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his woman. 17 If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

  4. Fact: Entice = Strong's concordance a primitive root; to open, i.e. be (causatively, make) roomy; usually figuratively (in a mental or moral sense) to be (causatively, make) simple or (in a sinister way) delude:--allure, deceive, enlarge, entice, flatter, persuade, silly (one).

  5. Fact: Moses used the word "surely" (had to) endow her to be his woman, the formality didn't make her his woman in God's eyes. Rather the formality was an expectation, you can say custom, tradition that men learn to expect. Moses in keeping order in the society, made it certain the expectations, even some customs would be fulfilled, within the confines of the principles, spiritual (mental disposition or another words frame of mind) laws, the particular law since the beginning, when one flesh occurred (mutual consented sexual intercourse) even if unknown to others, the couple was looked upon as joined of God, married.

  6. Fact: Moses making sure the dowry will be paid, the custom, so there will not be civil unrest. If civil unrest breaks out, Moses would lose the trust of the people and be dethroned. Because of this Moses made a law that insured the payment of money would surely be paid, so not to lose the people over grumbling, over lost money. Remember their were harden hearts in Israel who would use any chance they have to remove Moses from power. Because Moses done this, some only see what they want to see, such as the case of the revised standard version adding the word  “make" her to be his wife,  causing some seeing additional emphasis to infer wrongly marriage began at the payment of money. The society in Moses day, recognized marriage at joining of the flesh, would of seen Moses trying to keep peace in a situation that may be to some a great disappointment, hard to accept. They wouldn't of seen Moses saying marriage begins at a payment of money or at least the more enlighten, knowing God's ways wouldn't. The ones who were not more enlightened, the harden hearts of Israel would of seen at least the custom of dowry, money was paid, so as to offset the great disappointment, keeping them from causing civil unrest.

  7. Fact: When a man laid with a woman unknowingly to others, is found out, one will make a grave error not realizing the woman in many cases had a baby nine months later. Today millions of these babies are murdered, due to the consequences of the free love generation, in abortion 60,000,000 deaths and counting, or if she had the baby, was she to become a working single mom 3,300 years ago, in early biblical times? They made them remain together especially for the babies that would be born in such circumstances to be cared for by two parents, and for the young mother to have a husband to provide for her, besides recognizing marriage began at the moment of mutual one flesh, sexual intercourse only.

  8. Fact: This is the principle and reason why I proposed a law, by individual States, perhaps eventually a federal law, based upon the principle in Moses law to assure harmony and peace in society, to hold only particularly young couples in their teens, both being at the time virgins who had entered into mutual consented sexual intercourse, unknown to others, when found out to hold them accountable, by a law, as Moses by a law to fulfill the formalities of marriage. I propose the young couple to be officially recognized as married for at least seven years, to protect and give the young couple the best possibility of remaining in the marriage, and for the child to be born instead of premeditated murdered in abortion, to have two parents, for greater harmony and peace in society. Where I sense once ingrained in the youth by law, will continue even afterwards in the older general population, without a written law, but still be written in their hearts.

  9. Fact: Moses added more weight and in some regards amended, clarified any perhaps miss intentions in Exodus 22:16-17 by writing Deuteronomy 22:28.

  10. Fact: Deuteronomy 22:28 (KJV) If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold (Strongs Concordance 8610, a primitive root; to manipulate) on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29. Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's (young woman) father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his woman; because he hath humbled (Strong’s Concordance 3061) her, he may not put her away all his days.

  11. Fact: The word "hold" used in the above verse by Moses in Hebrew is "taphas" Strong's concordance 8610 = a primitive root; to manipulate, i.e. seize; chiefly to capture, wield, specifically, to overlay; figuratively, to use unwarrantably:--catch, handle, (lay, take) hold (on, over), stop, X surely, surprise, take.

  12. Fact: Hold, handle, control by the hands in a skillful manor, to manipulate the woman until she gives into her desires. Moses is basically describing the situation where the man doesn't entice by words, verbally, instead he holds the young virgin woman tightly to himself, torching her all over while kissing her passionately, and tries to have sexual intercourse with her, she may resist for a moment, then gives into her desires, by not resisting instead may hold onto him tightly, caressing him, or continued kissing him passionately while they both share in the sexual intercourse.

  13. Fact: The word "hold" used in Deuteronomy 22:28, has similar equivalent in Greek, where also is the word usage manipulate, handle, for example to manipulate, handle an instrument, by your hands to make sound, or manipulate, handle a corn cob, by your hands to remove the kernels, or the manipulate, handle the shovel, by your hands to dig.

  14. Fact: Moses first used "entice" meaning flattery in Exodus 22:16-17, then Moses uses the word "hold" means to manipulate, handled (without words), solely by feel, touch, until she responds, she mutually consents silently by returning affection to the man, giving herself over into one flesh, sexual intercourse.

  15. Fact: You can over lay Deuteronomy 22:28 on top of Exodus 22: 16-17, Moses clarified, further revealed to the very edge of real life happenings, why? A man's life is at stake. Moses going from the word "entice" to being aware of another type of situation to "lay hold", manipulated, handled the young virgin passionately, until she gives herself over to him into one flesh, sexual intercourse. Moses went further to cover such situations, so a young lady couldn't wiggle herself out of what had occurred, falsely testifying as if it were rape (when the man's life is at stake, stoning was the punishment), as if he didn't use a single word to flattery her, but he instead handled her in a skillful way such holding her tightly close, caresses her until she reciprocated by her body language, showed she consented.

  16. Fact: Moses clarified another of his intentions that he had in Exodus 22:16-17, less anyone mistaken his intentions. Moses had allowed a substandard endow of her before (perhaps also the people being poorer at the time living in the wilderness had not yet reached the promise land), and stated if her father utterly refuses, he must pay the full dowry, many mistakenly think with the words the father utter refuses, that the two can go their separate ways, wrong. Moses was only referring to the debate of amount of dowry the father utterly refuses, the father could be strident and refuse especially if the the amount was very little, where then Moses had written he had to give the full dowry, it was so understood that it wasn't necessary to write they were then to be united. In essence part of Exodus 22:16-17 is voided out, in regards to a lower dowry amount offered, the full dowry amount must be paid, no mention of father utterly refuses now, only that Moses continues writes, showing the expectation unsaid in Exodus 22: 16-17 was all the time to be and forevermore not doubted in Deuteronomy 22:28 "he may not put her away the rest of his days".

  17. Fact: Moses in bringing order to the custom of endowing, clarified, so the formalities would be followed orderly. Amended Exodus 22:16-17 by writing Deuteronomy 22:28, he change the words from entice to hold: 1.) Hold, manipulate, control by the hands in a skillful manor, as to entice to have sexual intercourse. 2.) Change the price, no longer can the man who laid with the young woman unknowingly to others, when found out, offer a substandard amount. He must pay the full amount at the start. Where before the father of the daughter can refuse the low substandard offer. If refused he had to pay full amount, and she was his woman. 3.) Moses further strengthens the expectations, he cannot put her away the rest of his days.

  18. Fact: The NIV, New International Version of the Bible published in 1978, in the verse Deuteronomy 22:28 has change the word from "hold" to "rape". They have applied an over the top translation, which is not in keeping to almost every other translation, which didn't assigned the word rape. The word in question hold = Strong's concordance a primitive root; to manipulate, control by the hands, in a skillful manor. As to entice to have sexual intercourse, is not used where there is a description of rape in the bible. It was the case of mutual consent sexual intercourse, not by force, but the way of man's hands holds, in a skillful manor, as to entice, embraces, caresses a young woman, until she consents shows passion in return, to the extent she permits, allows sexual intercourse to occur.

  19. Fact is Muslims and an over the top translation of the bible the NIV causing many who read the NIV, have applied a false translated word "rape", have ran off the cliff, into falsely thinking Moses was describing rape and there was forced recognition of marriage in cases of rape.

  20. Fact: Contrary the old testament is specific as to the law on rape, used a particular Hebrew word "chazaq" means "force", not mutual consent of either reciprocal verbal or silent body language allowing permission for sexual intercourse.

  21. Fact: The concept of “ONE FLESH" marriage was also confirmed and affirmed 1500 years later by a man named Jesus, who referred to himself by the son of man of Nazareth: Matt 19:4 And he answered and said, Have ye not read, that he who made [them] from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife (woman, the word wife, a word showing marriage status, came years after the bible was written); and the two shall become one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse)? 6 So that they are no more two, but one flesh (same flesh since sexual intercourse, to mean in a figurative speaking sense seen as one person permanently). What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

  22. Fact: While Jesus was walking and preaching, this was the mind set, spirit, mental disposition of Jesus and the people. Jesus validates this mind set, commands the primary part of this law, which is “they twain (two) shall be one flesh (sexual intercourse)? Wherefore they are no more twain (two), but one flesh (same flesh since sexual intercourse). Therefore what God hath joined together, let not man put asunder (separate)".

  23. Fact: Jesus when setting up his spiritual kingdom's laws on earth, the church, does not command, state anything as to the custom, tradition of dowry (money paid) or any other moment or action required, but only states at the moment, action of one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse), let not man separate, for his kingdom, the church.

  24. Fact: Fornication is a broader meaning terminology that can be compared to similar words we use today, such as the phrase sexual immorality, as in adultery, prostitution, incest (suggesting also homosexuality and bestiality) in one word. Or the broader meaning word perverted we may used today; if used in biblical times meaning anything sexually, particularly anything sexually outside the teachings of the ancient nation of Israel.

  25. Fact: Fornication = Strong’s Concordance 4202; harlotry (prostitution) adultery and incest.

  26. Fact: The modern day definition of the word fornication you find in the dictionary has a usage of premarital sex, is not the defined usage of the word as used in biblical times as defined by Moses, as defined by Jesus, as defined by his Apostles.

  27. Fact never is there mention once a vow in the entire bible involving marriage.

  28. Fact never is there mention any resemblance of a public ceremony profession of each others love to each other. However I am not proposing ever to remove laws of marriage certificates, or stop a simple public ceremony of even a profession of each others love to each other without oaths disguised as vows. The government marriage certificate is a law that has many benefits, which makes it absolutely necessary to be continued as a law, for social peace and harmony.

  29. Fact in the bible, the sole evidence at best is the bride and groom during a wedding fest, were led to a room prepared for them, to become one flesh, one of their ways of saying mutual consented sexual intercourse, that afterwards was seen by the participants at the fest, as the marriage occurred in a private expression of love itself on a bed became one flesh, mutually consented sexual intercourse.

  30. Fact there are two witnesses Moses and Jesus that substantiates the ancient taught, practiced and accepted exact moment marriages occurs, at the moment of one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse) known or even unknown to all others in the situation of being enticed or the other case even when no words are spoken, holds, handles, manipulates in a skilled manner (caressing) a woman until she gives herself by her continued reciprocating to the man she loves.

  31. Fact Moses never referred or implied to either cases as sin, fornication, or unlawful, or any place else in the entire bible referred or implied as sin, fornication, or unlawful.

  32. Fact: In the situation of rape, there is no mutual consent and means it is not a marriage.

  33. Fact: As pertaining to rape, Moses wrote Deuteronomy 22:25-27 (KJV) But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die. 26.) But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbor, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: 27.) For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.

  34. Fact: Moses used a precise Hebrew word means "forced" to identify the situation of rape. Moses only wrote a law of a betrothed woman was raped. Moses didn't write a law specifying a widowed or married or a virgin not betrothed was raped, or attempted rape. I gather the above law Deuteronomy 22:25-27 was dealing with a more difficult case the expectations of custom of betrothed, but also be some guidance to deal with rapist of any type of woman, a widow, married woman or virgin not betrothed, some laws didn't need to be written down, they were so universally understood in the hearts and minds of men, even before any laws of Moses was given, that either of these situations had occurred, would of received death by the judges for the rapist. There is another reason that crosses my mind, the law was weak in that, describing most types of sin, in this in itself makes known evil to man, and being man is weak in the flesh (especially before Christ knowledge how to deal with sin), tempts him, described by Paul in the book of romans. So every vile form of sin, wasn't written done if not necessary, enough laws were written that other vile wrongs not clearly written, were understood enough by the laws written, to judge every matter appropriately. 

  35. Fact: With all that said, the focus will be on the primary part of the Moses law, without the customs, traditions of men, as in the beginning of genesis, men and woman first were recognized as married at simply the moment of one flesh, simple mutual consented sexual intercourse, then later developed customs, traditions, began to be integrated, and expectations. When Jesus arrives, he removes the customs, traditions and states the original moment of being married in God's eyes. Jesus declares at the moment of one flesh, mutual consented sexual intercourse are married, and declares command "Not let man separate" are the words, golden proclamation that binds the couple forever, until death.

  36. Fact: Concerning words "Man" and "Woman" it is very important to discern in the Bible, that some falsely assumed when it says "husband" or "wife" in certain places of the bible they were married, before they become one flesh. Actually there is only the words "man" or "woman" wherever the words "husband" or "wife" is seen in the bible. The words man or woman was used sometimes with the sense, usage of having marriage status or other usage. However there was no word used in biblical times such as husband or wife, specifying marriage status within these words alone. Husband or wife, are words that were created many centuries after the bible was written.

  37. Fact: Anyone can easily look in a Strong's Concordance where the Strong's number is identified for the word "wife" Mat 19:5 is identified as (1135). This same number (1135) is used in a number of verses for "woman" that shows an unmarried woman. Same for the word man, the Strong's accordance number is 435, which is used for married or unmarried.

  38. Fact: The translators of the bible in their aim to make the bible easier to read perhaps some unconsciously, some not unconsciously built on earlier translators zeal to promote a man's conjured up moment when marriage occurs. They have applied the non biblical terminology husband or wife, in passages where there is no clear evidence marriage status was applied. Attempting to discredit marriage occurs at "one flesh" (sexual intercourse) and "let not man separate", cited by Jesus. In so doing, many people cannot get pass this stumbling block of a non biblical terminology husband or wife, and insist wrongly because these words "husband" or "wife" are seen in their bible presuming showing marriage status, they must be married.

  39. Fact: For those who wish to look deeper into these matters, I have written two exhaustive detailed reports: 

1.) http://www.christjustified.com/marriage.html 
2.) http://www.christjustified.com/jesusmarriageproclamation.html

Diminished comprehension and practice of the historical biblical concept of  "One Flesh Marriage",  due to the so called Catholic group and other religious groups placing stumbling blocks/barriers in the minds of their subjects down through the centuries:

  1. Fact: The Catholic group around 500 years ago, place stumbling blocks/barriers in the minds of their subjects and adherents that hindered their ability to perceive the biblical concept of One Flesh Marriage. 

  2. Fact: In 1403, the Bishop of Magdeburg threatening to excommunicate those who married without clergy in attendance. 

  3. Fact: Council of Trent in 1563 officially required that Catholic marriages be presided over by a priest.

  4. Fact: The so called catholic group and other religious groups purposely defied the biblical concept "One flesh Marriage", leaves open the door for Infidel Philosophy to take root.

  5. Wikipedia "The oldest traditional wedding vows can be traced back to the manuals of the medieval church." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_vows

  6. Fact: The Catholic group teaching created notions in the populous that even influence much of all the religious groups. 

  7. Fact: The so called Catholic group as a national State religion, had a stranglehold in laws, forbid subjects and adherents to read the bible, even used terror in burning bible reading men and woman at the stake and in torture devices such as the rack, stretching men and woman's bodies, pulling slowly dislocating joints and later to die a painful, agonizing death in dark, cold, and damp dungeons

  8. Fact: Many so called bishops to retain even more power, riches, living lavishly and ruling as kings, force their subjects and adherents to have their priest at the center of a so called marriage ceremony, with the use of so called vows and defining a marriage ceremony as a so called sacrament, was taught and implied as the define moment when marriage only occurred. This became a substantial controlling effect to make void the ancient, biblical text concept of “one flesh marriage” seen as the exact moment when marriage occurred.

  9. Fact: The Catholic group defined a one flesh marriage, with no ceremony as fornication, when the bible never once defined it as fornication, sin.

  10. Fact: Contrary if was taught and practiced "One Flesh Marriage" recognition when occurred, would greatly limit the sprouting of Infidel philosophy's primary tenet so called sex radical-free love and lessen premeditated, murdering of babies in abortion.

  11. Fact: A public profession of love for each other and consent is very proper, very commendable and very beneficial for social order, peace and harmony, however is not necessary for a "One Flesh Marriage" to occur. 

  12. Fact: A public profession if has the words God or Lord, the male or female are perceiving themselves swearing verbally or even only consciously, promising to each other certain actions, then this fits the biblical description of an oath. Which would violate Jesus' supreme and primary teaching against making oaths for any situation. Jesus words: Matt 5:33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths: 34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: 35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. 36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.37 But let your speech be, Yes, yes; No, no: and whatsoever is more than these is of the evil.

  13. Fact: A marriage certificate is a legal requirement, is very proper, very commendable and very beneficial for social order, peace and harmony, however is not necessary for a "One Flesh Marriage" to occur.

  14. Fact: Only a marriage occurs at the exact moment of one flesh (mutual consented sexual intercourse), known or unknown to others.


(Early 1900's) Morphed-Infidelism (anti-Christian regurgitated, morphed, rebranded ancient Greek philosophy) taken over a number of protestant institutions, churches, colleges and seminaries using the "inclusivist strategy":

(Christians Only: A History of the Restoration Movement, James D. Murch pp 223-235)

    1. Fact: "Under the spell of the evolutionary principle and a philosophy of immanence, the influential Christian theologians came to view Christianity as the highest expression of an essence common to all religions and to regard Christian experience as fully explainable from the study of naturalistic and behavioristic psychology.'

    2. Fact: "The bible was all but abandoned, and they turned to the universal movements of thought for the most significant disclosures of God and moral and spiritual absolutes"

    3. Fact: “no two liberals thought exactly the alike, but the general principles were the same.”

    4. Fact: "The Bible was to them merely a historical record of the developing religious consciousness of the Jewish people"

    5. Fact: "The Gospel, for the liberals, was utterly changed from the means of reconciliation with God, or the redemption of the soul from sin, or the liberation of man from the bondage of evil, to a sense of final piety, or brotherhood, or of mutual understanding and human betterment."

    6. Fact: "the church became, for liberals, merely a fraternal society with certain social benefits."

    7. Fact: "Liberals were not interested in carrying out the imperative the great commission, but they were vitally concerned with the control of machinery that would give them world influence and an opportunity to remake the international social order."

    8. Fact: "The liberal movement swept Christendom as wildfire, carried along by the growing popular evolutionary philosophy and the upsurge of science and invention. Higher education abandoned the Christian philosophy upon which it had grown to mammoth proportions. God-centered education was exchanged for a man-centered process, God's will was no longer the basic norm.  Man's mind became the measure of all things. The moral and spiritual ultimates, even truth itself,  were scrapped for relative values. Human social welfare became a matter of primary concern. The goal of education was no longer to fit men to live in harmony with the will of God. Education, in the new view, became an instrument by which the developing and changing person might continue in the quest for certainty. Genuine values and tenable ends and ideals could be found said liberals, only within movement of experience and not from authority, human or supernatural." 

    9. Fact: "In the atmosphere of the colleges and universities and their associated theological seminaries. the new intellectual movement found its most effective breeding ground. The new Baptist-related university of Chicago, backed by Rockefeller millions, headed by Dr. William  Rainey influence in the United States. Theological liberals first attacked strategic chairs of religion and the well = endowed seminaries of the leading protestant denominations. Bible believing professors were discredited by well  directed propaganda which made them appear as naive, obscurantist, unscholarly, and reactionary.

    10. Fact: "In many instances liberals falsely represented themselves to be evangelical, accepting under oath evangelical confessions of faith "with mental reservations' using orthodox words to convey liberal thought, and moving with caution until circumstances afforded safe opportunity to take on open stand for the new doctrines. 

    11. Fact: Often they used the so-called -- "inclusivist strategy" -- persuading orthodox institutions to admit liberals to their faculties on the ground that the principle of academic freedom required presentation of all viewpoints. When liberals attained majority status they set up new standards and by various devices eliminated all bible-believing professors. Once firmly entrenched in the institutions that trained the leadership of the churches, they next directed their strategies to obtain control of the important boards and commissions, and finally the administrative machinery of the whole denomination.” (Christians Only: A History of the Restoration Movement, James D. Murch pp 223-23

    12. Fact: "Protestant institutions that supports premeditated murder of innocent Complete Genetic Human Lives (abortion): United Church of Christ, the United Methodist Church, the Episcopalian Church, United Presbyterian Church, Lutheran Women's Caucus, The American Baptist Churches USA, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, and the Presbyterian Church (USA)


(Early 1970's onward) State Secular Religion of Morphed-Infidelism, unconstitutional massive education system having 1800 government funded Universities and colleges and monopoly 1- 12 grades that was a substantial controlling effect in the premeditated murder of over 60,000,000 CGHL/babies/future citizen:

  1. Fact: Congresses unconstitutionally respected the secular religion establishments of philosophy (infidel philosophy) and its offspring of psychology, sociology, and psychiatry, and their transformed/morphed various philosophies. 

  2. Fact: Created an unconstitutional substantial controlling effect in the denial of Constitutional rights to millions of the nation's Complete Genetic Human Lives (CGHL) /babies/future citizens while in their mother's wombs, consequently were premeditated murdered.

  3. Fact: Infidel Philosophy having ancient origins opposed religion and morality in every succeeding generation, a significant ongoing substantial controlling effect against the ancient biblical concept One Flesh. 

  4. Fact: Philosophy's offspring Psychology, Sociology and Psychiatry in their blindness also attacked the concept of one flesh.

  5. Fact: (1980's onward) Infidelism Morphed into Safe Sex, free love for the younger generation taught at 100,000 public schools

  6. Fact: Morphed Infidelism teaching so call sex ed, use of contraceptives, undermined the practice for thousands of years, we call today shot gun marriages, based upon the verifiable biblical secular concept of "One Flesh" marriage, shown through out the bible, in Genesis, Moses civil law for social peace and the son of man named Jesus of Nazareth, practiced for thousands of years and particularly practice more in the non urban countryside by bible readers.

  7. Fact: Public teachers are an unconstitutional unelected massive monopoly political power house of six million unelected member government bureaucracy by itself, undermines the Constitution's checks and balances of distributed power in government, and has undermined the people (general population) allotment of power in the election process for decades.

  8. Fact: Also can be claimed is a violation of the spirit behind anti-trust laws, which should be imposed upon the massive government so called educational system k-12 grade. 

  9. Fact: Ponder this, we Americans don't trust the private sector to have a monopoly, but we are brain washed by a secular religion of the establishment of philosophy (infidel philosophy) and its offspring psychology, sociology, psychiatry, teacher associations and unions into trusting them to have a monopoly educating the nation's children and young men and woman.

  10. Fact: Many young woman succumb to the underlying infidel, free love, abortion and so called safe sex philosophies indoctrination while prolonging not getting married, had put to death their complete genetic human life (CGHL)/baby in their womb on the figuratively speaking high alter of government indoctrination of infidel philosophy morphing and CAREERISM, so it won't interfere with at times continuing her primary and/or secondary so called education/indoctrination.

  11. Fact: If Congresses hadn't respected the secular religion establishments and disallowed them from forming the unconstitutional massive monopoly government funded k-12 grade, instead allowed the tax payer money to follow the student, would of allowed many more bible reading schools to form, and not only created competition, that's self regulating to achieve higher scores for better education, but also would secured a larger electorate to sense and practice the underlying concept of “one flesh”, which would of kept babies alive in their mother's wombs. 

  12. Fact: Many more young people would of continued learning, teaching and practicing the ancient and biblical concept of “ONE FLESH” implied from simply reading the bible, to permeate society directly resulting in lifetime marriages from virginity and indirectly would have had a substantial controlling effect of assuring a large enough electorate to protect (CGHL)/babies rights in their mother's wombs, which would have been a substantial controlling effect upon the U.S. Supreme court to also protect them.

  13. Fact: (2004 onward) Infidelism Morphed into Sodomy Marriages Philosophy 

  14. Fact: Using a "modified version of the Inclusivist Strategy" Philosophy with the vast government education system of 1800 government universities, colleges had slowly indoctrinated acceptance of sodomist and their marriages. 

  15. Fact: When sodomist and their marriages are then included in special laws, they then begin to discriminate, shun, and remove anyone who disagrees, shares, speaks or writes down their thoughts against them. This is what happens when you give special rights to homosexuals.

  16. Fact: (2012 onward) Morphed-Infidelism Great Purge of Judeo-Christianity from America

  17. Fact: Great Purge of Religious Conservatives and the Nation's Judea-Christian heritage is occurring across the government institutions and market place (businesses). A violation of Christian's first amendment's rights and the undermining of the Judea-Christian derived morality based nation's founding documents and government laws.

  18. Fact: Examples of cases that intimidate Christians from sharing, speaking or writing down their views, their religious and secular (things of the world) freedom of expression in government institutions and the market place (businesses).

  19. (2012) Say It With Flowers: Court Rules Against Arlene’s Flowers

  20. (2013) Is President Obama Purging the Military of Dissenters? "Several of the other six generals and flag officers fired were allegedly critical of other Obama policies such as military cuts, the removal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, and America’s new policy on Iran."

  21. (2014) First US Lesbian Mayor, City of Houston demands pastors turn over sermons

  22. (2014) Obama Orders Military Not To Handout Bibles, Rear Admiral Responds

  23. (2015)  Kelvin Cochran, Atlanta Fire Chief 

  24. (2015) Indiana Christian Bakers Who Declined to Bake Cake for Same-Sex Ceremony Close Shop 

  25. (2015) Should Pro-Life Organizations Be Forced to Hire Pro-Choice Employees? 

  26. (2015) Is a Navy Chaplain Being Persecuted for Biblical Beliefs?

  27. Congress Supports Chaplain Reprimanded for Citing Bible in Suicide Prevention Training Session

  28. Fact: Many cannot serve sodomist couples in instances when their conscious finds serving adds to validation to a clear, violation of the consistent Jedeo-Christian Principled Morality against sodomist. 

  29. Fact: A great warning sign has been written in the Judeo writings to stop nations from going down such a path, the warning of sodomist's insatiable desire is to pull everyone into their immorality.

  30. Fact: Wikipedia: Genesis 19:4-5 (KJV) described what followed, which confirmed its end: 4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, [even] the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: 5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where [are] the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.(NRSV: know them, NIV: can have sex with them, NJB: can have intercourse with them).

  31. Question: "What was the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah?"

  32. Fact: Many worry not only for the present time but worry especially for the future in the sodomist's insatiable desire to use inclusivist strategy for their ultimate goal, to keep tearing down the morality of the nation until they pull everyone into their immorality, complete domination. 

  33. Fact: Our nation has given itself over to a violation of the center core principle of the Judeo-Christian Principled Heritage of our nation. In so doing, they unleash an insatiable beast that now purges and marginalizes anyone who dares to stand in their way.

  34. Fact: The real question is when will America wake up, to tear out the root of the problem in their billions of tax dollars for decades been given to 1800 government Universities and colleges is funding a State Secular religion? Our nation is being divided, weaken, and destroyed from within by an Unconstitutional State Secular religion of Morphed-Infidelism.

  35. Fact: How is a nation hope to avoid chaos, ruination when there is a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution's primary principle, in the First Amendment's – Establishment Clause. Congress for decades making law respecting a Secular religion of Morphed-Infidelism.

  36. Next on the horizon from Morphed-Infidelism:



Summary
:
  1. Fact:  The "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry" was introduced on government universities and colleges where exist - extreme bias in significant conflicts of interest, deceitfulness, bigotry --  by way of a stacked deck of open professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors/scientist and administration. They coveted POLITICAL POWER INFLUENCE and WEALTH in prominence, name recognition, as individuals, as a group, job protection, increased salaries, tenure, increased pensions, chased lucrative government research grants, combined with similar bias scientist, journals, resulted in atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science. They unconstitutionally created significant numbers of atheistic and infidel philosophy adherents in a muti-trillion dollar State Secular Religion industry in government academia, in many other branches of government such as k-12, armed services, jails, courts, hospitals, protective services and in the private sector. All combined became an extremely bias panel of judges that UNCONSTITUTIONALLY bullied/determined  the  "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry" should be taught as true/correct/fact and continues being taught as true/correct/fact, when its merely atheists and infidels stacked deck bias junk science.
  1. Fact: An universal code, principle of conduct concerning a conflict of interest in any type of judge over any matter, can be obtained in 28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;


  1. Fact: It was a forgone conclusion - science wasn't the decided factor - but the - extremely bias, major conflicts of interest, deceitful, bigoted - liberal government academia, stacked deck of opening professing and leaning towards atheist and infidel philosophy tenured professors/scientists and administration combined with similar bias, scientists, journals to teach and to continued being taught the "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry" as "true/correct/fact".

  2. Fact: Any government institution employee teaching the "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry" as "true/correct/fact", that is merely atheistic and morphed infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group derived junk science combined with similar bias scientists, journals, is unconstitutional according to precedent Supreme Court cases that defines a secular religion establishment, when has the element in a supreme being/God effect, the junk science that is falsely perceived as unbiased science, has an equivalent sense of true and correctness as a supreme being/God effect which many believe in, defines a secular religion Torcaso v. Watkins, 397 U.S. 488, 495, n.ll (1961), U.S. v Seeqer 380 U.S. 162,176 (1965) and Welsh v. U.S.398 U.S. 333 (1970), and consequently violates the Establishment Clause "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...".

  3. Fact: Any employee of a government university or any other government institution that teaches the "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry" is true/fact, is nothing more then teaching - atheistic and infidel philosophy bias derived junk science, is a sham and scam, organized crime in a Rico violation committed against American citizens to rob us of:

  1. Fact: When government/Congress had made law respecting one particular human behavior group (secular religion) in the establishment of the "Theory of Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry", over the establishments of Judeo-Christian human behavior groups (traditional religion) that uses secular information contained in the library of sixty six books by thirty nine authors called the bible, such as the bible's earlier terminologies "spirit, spiritual and spiritually" defining "mental disposition" and the bible's a large source of in effect, in the field observational findings of both animal and human, lower and higher order behavior, it can be constitutionally persuasively argued that government/Congress in effect had violated indirectly and directly the core, primary, supreme premise, intent and principle of our Constitutional First Amendment Establishment Clause "Congress shall not make law respecting an establishment of religion"

  2.  Fact: The founding Fathers did not envision or establish in the formation of government, in the Constitution, such a large transfer of unchecked political power to 1800 government universities and colleges in effect political megaphones, a colossal government institutional bureaucracy respecting a secular religion of atheistic and infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group derived junk science, combined with similar bias scientist, journals, having a God, Supreme being effect is perceived as true and correct which millions of impressionable youthful citizens are hood winked into believing, and where particularly Democratic politicians are in lock step, taking their marching orders.

  3. Fact: Even though overwhelming evidence shows Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry to be atheistic and infidel philosophy bias junk science, it is instead deceitfully portrayed as unbiased science having a God, Supreme being effect is perceived as true and correct where millions believe in and direct their every aspect of life equivalent to the Judeo-Christian religion groups; which constitutes and fits the definition by the United States Supreme court as a secular religion.

  4. Fact: All religions be they secular or traditional could claim they promote the nation's general welfare, however this does not grant Presidents, Congresses and Judges the authority of the "General Welfare Clause" to breach the wall of separation in the "Establishment Clause".

  5. Fact: Presidents, Congresses and Judges for decades have violated the U.S. Constitution, have made law and ruled, respecting an establishment of a Secular Religion of Morphed-Infidelism.

  6. Fact: All courts of the land, including the U.S. Supreme Court have been unduly influence, through 150 years by merely atheistic and morphed infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group combined with similar bias scientist, journals derived junk science.

  7. Fact: All judges of the land now have major conflicts of interest in the many thousands of rulings supporting a mere atheistic and morphed infidel philosophy bias lopsided government institutional group combined with similar bias scientist, journals derived junk science in Evolution, Sociology, Psychology and Psychiatry that it automatically excludes them from judging the constitutionality of the matter. Leaving such an important matter in the hands of so few, would be both unlawful according to 28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge and extremely unwise.

  8. For the many reasons above, I John Jerome Nowak propose an amendment to the constitution is in order, if not according to the constitutional provision through Congress then convening a constitutional convention to inscribe as if in stone as much as possible an unmovable supreme law of the land, Amendment 28 Secular religions shall be removed from all Government


Section IV

(2007) Solutions: Constitutional Spirit, Amendments to the Constitution and Federal law:


Amendment 28: Secular religions shall be removed from all Government

Section One: Secular religions shall be removed from all Government.

Section Two: Religion to be officially recognized by the United States government as a human behavioral group with having a belief in God or a substitute in a sincere and meaningful belief that occupied in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God. Such as may exist in a person/possessor a “sense of things as in true, correct” that equates in similar regard as a “Supreme Being as in true, correct” outside of a traditional religion, still amounts to religion.

Section Three: The "Theory of Evolution" and the theory of "Intelligent Design" will  only be allowed to be taught by any non government group on the outside of government through private means/funding only, be allowed access to government funded academia and public schools K-12 to present a case for either. There will be no more government grants for either teaching, or research on the "Theory of Evolution", which would also exclude the theory of "Intelligent Design".

Section Four: Psychology, Psychiatry, Sociology and Philosophy (infidel philosophy) to be officially recognized by the United States government, as human behavior groups, secular religions. 

Section Five: Government shall make no law respecting an establishment of Psychology, Psychiatry, Sociology and Philosophy (infidel philosophy), or prohibiting free exercise of.  Government will neither promote or establish psychologists, psychiatrist instead promote and establish social workers for feeding, sheltering, clothing, giving medical care, and stabilizing the emotional disturbed from harming themselves. Most rarest, special circumstances, such as if someone dangers themselves or others, a group of people employed by the state, will be given the most minimal task, of stabilization, without drugs or counseling. 

Section Six: Constitutional rights of the stabilized emotional disturbed, to choose from a list of groups for their counseling. Equal access to the stabilized emotional disturbed, by all law abiding groups outside of government, either philosophy, psychology (non-traditional religion), or traditional religion and morality. 

Section Seven: All influences, counseling will be given strictly to groups who are private funding only, religious or secular. All human behavior groups, establishments non-traditional secular religion, or traditional religion will only be on the outside of government, who fairly complete for private funding, the trust of the People, by the People only. 

Section Eight: All law abiding groups non-traditional secular religion, or traditional religion can submit their name of their group and what they offer counseling, fellowship, daily living needs, as examples, on a list, which would be given to anyone who goes through the courts, jails, hospitals, schools, all state institutions of our nation. Which allows any individual to choose from the list for his or her counseling “private funded only”. No longer will people as in years past, be at the mercy of government employees, to insure their government jobs: 

Section Nine: All providence would be private funding only, be left to the people to decide with their donations alone, to a human behavior group of their choosing, this solely to decide which type and the extant of a human behavior group’s reach, providing counseling, fellowship, daily living needs, prescription drugs, as examples would be offered. The empowerment will return to the people as it was originally designed in the constitution. The people will determine, dependent upon what they observe in their society, if they will allow such use of drugs or limitation of such drugs.

Section Ten: The category of prescription drugs, psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, to be voted upon by the people in each state, if to be prohibited to anyone under the age of 12 years old, under the age of 18 years old. If enough qualified signatures on a petition, placed on a balled to be voted to prohibited all together. Voted upon by the people in each state, if to be prohibited to anyone in jail.

  1. If not prohibited all together, only voluntarily and with the permission of all three below, will be permitted to receive a psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, for the maximum of three months:

  1. A judge elected by the people every four years, anyone of the jurisdiction can be a candidate, if be for, against, or the limitation of granting and prohibiting specific psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, presented before the electorate. The judge will decided each case of his or her jurisdiction only, presented before his or her court. The person who will take the psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, must be present in front of the judge. The Judge cannot force anyone to take psychiatric drugs, antidepressants. 

  2. Medical doctor

  3. Human behavior group of one’s choosing. 

  1. All three permissions from a judge, medical doctor and a human behavior group of one’s choosing, to renew the prescription up to one year maximum usage of the prescription. Every year must go through same renewal process, including their presence before the judge.

  2. If the judge determines will end the prescription, there will be provided a gradual lower dosage for weaning off the drugs that are addictive.

  3. The people must retain a control, in voting for which judge to serve for four years, in granting or prohibiting psychiatric drugs, antidepressants, use.

Section Eleven: Break up the monopoly colossal government primary education (bias towards Infidelism morphed) establishment into three parts - Our Nation has a New Enemy Within Army of Disciples in Philosophy (Infidelism) 5-17-2010) :

  1. One third state education

  2. One third supported by vouchers private education

  3. One third who home school their children (supported by a smaller percentage of money provided for mothers).

Section Twelve: The government schools, lock, trust, monopoly on education, absolutely will be broken up, through vouchers (100 percentage amount of government school pays for per pupil), where the money follows to the child:

  1. Parents to choose the particular institutions of government or a private institution that has a particular human behavioral persuasion of the parents choosing. 

  2. Private schools will receive government funds per student, parents choosing. They must meet standards of safety, be law abiding and minim hours per subject. As to religious instructions, being they are a private institutions of the people, are exempt from restrictions from teaching tenets of their human behavior group, be it consisting of a God or not. Example such as any human behavior group, Christianity, Muslim, philosophy, psychology, atheism, etc. 

  3. Private schools must be law abiding, violations of laws will loose their prevision to student's funds from government. With the principle of equality to all human behavior groups, allows then public funds be used strictly according to the parent's sole choice of school. 

  4. All public school, will hand out diplomas at 10 grade, 16 years of age. Where some young men and woman will move on to marriage, not being hampered by not receiving a diploma, young woman will begin families, instead of murdering their babies in abortion. Young men will work to support their family. 

  5. Their will be optional two grades for occupational studies, especially for them who do not marry. 

  6. School with grades 9 to 12, will become open to other human behavior groups to use as facilities, consequently will then minus the among of pupil percentage government funds that follows the student, equal to upkeep of the facilities. To keep order and peace in the facilities, all apostatizing, converting, would be excluded from the halls, except for a standardized bill board beside each doorway, what is offered in the room. Their will be limits to volume of sound coming form the rooms. 

  7. Facilities from 9 to 12 grades, will one hour after the regular classes, will be open to all human behavior groups of the local district, all ages, all citizens, for multiple use facilities, with a small fee required to rent rooms, hall, or gym for the expenses of the facilities to operate. All government facilities for 8 grade or lower, will be restricted from other groups use and after hours facility use, for safety concerns, unless voted individually in each local district, the amount of facility availability, as long as equal to all.

  8. Government must also encourage home schooling, such as an amount of money would be giving to the mothers to home school. 

  9. Half the money that would be normally used by government schools per pupil, as an incentive for homeschooling. 

  10. 50 percent of the full amount, due to more expenses when having children leave home for a school, the added cost of buildings and so the mother aren't only interested in the money. This to encourage mothers and make it more easier for them to remain home. Where mothers and fathers training their own children is the idea setting over any other setting imagined by man or government bureaucracy. For mothers and fathers to care, nurture and teach their children in the ways of their choosing of a particular human behavior group, and in the ways of good citizenship. 

  11. To safe guard from abuses, from age of 5 to 11, every six months monitoring through standardized test, and 12 years old to 15 years old, quarterly monitoring through government standardize test would be administered in the government school, for the basics reading, writing, math, history. Supervised by a government official, If not pass, then the child has to to be either sent to public school, or a private school. 

  12. To protect home schooling from abuse and not to encourage an over abundance of having children, for financial gain only, each child addition, would receive one half of financial support, each child's before them. For example say the first child receive 7,000, second would receive 3500, third child would receive 1750, forth child and beyond will receive a minim of 1750. 

  13. As to discourage adultery, for any children born out of the marriage with another woman, will not be eligible to receive financial support, for home schooling, will only be eligible for private schooling or public schooling. 

  14. Any child born in the marriage, by another man, then her husband, will also not be eligible for financial support for home schooling for the particular child.

  15. Either parent convicted of felon, will be not be eligible for seven years to receive financial support, for home schooling.

Section Thirteen: PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES:

  1. All Physical world Philosophy associates itself with particularly rudiments/elements/properties of nature, the physical world around us, can be still be studied and only used in their respective science class rooms.

  2. All Human Behavior Philosophy (infidel philosophy) and it's offspring Psychology, Sociology and Psychiatry departments, must all cease and desist their operations, be removed from all State institutions. Where no so called teacher/professor, student/disciple in these can received any tuition funds of the public institution, government subsidies of government student aid, and pensions must be ended. Why because its a violation of the Establishment Clause.

  3. All political Philosophy such as Political (so called) science departments being they have human behavior philosophy at their center, if not closed should be very much scrutinized and some compromise may be a more appropriate solution.

  4. All the above philosophies, would still be allowed access to particularly public higher education institutions approx 2,000 public universities and colleges.

  5. Traditional or non-traditional religion will each be offered the same respect and allowances, where they can rent a room in a public institution as a club, and be treated the same, no less and no more then any other club, traditional religion or non-traditional religion. I propose they can also be offered to use for hourly periods of time rooms and halls free of charge on the campus, with the State institution's guidelines of total impartiality shown towards all groups.

Section Fourteen: PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES USE OF CLASSROOMS AND HALLS:

  1. Classrooms and halls, are to be used by either a non traditional or traditional religion by appointment only, appointed hourly time limits, the group must be law abiding, sound levels must be under certain limits, absolutely no request for money while in the free classroom or hall, when the classroom or hall is occupied their proselytizing is limited to the inside the classroom or hall. In the hall way proselytizing is limited to only a simple sign, what the group offers can be easily slid the information in a standard adapter on the outside of the room near the side of the door, when the room would soon be occupied, for anyone to read. No leader, teacher or however one is called by the group, can receive any of the institution's tuition from the students or government subsidies for students.

  2. Each group, secular religion or tradition religion, only source of funds will be solely by private means off campus, such as directing anyone to a groups website, and/or in a rented groups room on campus where request for donations is allowed to occur.


Amendment 29: Human Life Born of Water and Genetics

Section One: First birth of a human occurs when the sperm, seed of the male births into the egg of a female, forming a Complete Genetic Human Life (CGHL). 



Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins



Section Two: The born of genetics, human life, has the self-evident right to live up to the second birth.

Section Three: Second birth of a human occurs when usually the nine month developed CGHL, births out of the water into the world.

Section Four: The born of water human life has the self-evident rights of his or her family and country.


----------------------------------------

"Human life Born of Water and Genetics

Written around 1992-1993

First birth of a human occurs when the sperm from the male births into the egg of a female, forming a complete genetic human life. The born of genetics, human life, has the self-evident right to live up to the second birth.

Second birth of a human occurs when usually the nine month developed complete genetic human life, births out of the water into the world. The born of water human life has the self-evident rights of his or her family and country.

A lady of wisdom says to imprison every woman who killed their born complete genetic hum life for twenty four hours. Imprison every doctor for thirty days an confiscate all wealth received in committing the killings. Imprison every advocate for sixty days that had used the media to promote the killings. Imprison any person for the possibility of many years, if he or she destroys any information of the identification of the people involved in the killings.

If I was elected to an official office and was given the authority to judge the matter before us. I would pardon the prison term of every person who killed a complete genetic human life, if the person would make know their participation or killing with remorse to the people, in the largest news paper of their locality.

All wealth received in committing the killings would still be confiscated for a memorial park in Washington D. C. for the remembrance of the Slain Complete Genetic Human Life."

-----------------------------------------

11-28-2008 Therefore since the democratic party had fallen in hook and sinker with government promoted psychology and philosophy (infidel philosophy). Had relabeled youthful marriage when unknown to others, and particularly went the extra mile towards evil, promoted the slow torture and murder of these couples children. To allow the democratic party to continue, will be as if allowing the Nazi party to continue. There are 60,000,000 slow tortured, murdered babies crying aloud for justice at the door of the democratic party. I John Jerome Nowak, call for the Democratic party, the house of slow torture and murder, to close it's doors, cease and desist all it's operations forever more. For it's name will forever be linked to the the greatest premeditated mass murder, slow torture of 60,000,000 lives. More murders then the Nazi party. The leaders and judges of the land must be held to a higher accountability. All politicians and judges, from the lowest to the highest office of the land, currently elect or unelected, who promoted, propagated the mass slow torture and murder of 60,000,000 lives, in abortion, would be advise to hand in their resignation. Upon the resignation a new election be held in 90 days. When upon that election day, 25 days afterwards the office will be vacated, all criminal charge will be dropped, and the newly elected official will be place in charge. The politicians and judges who do not hand in their resignation, all criminal charges will remain against them, in their participation to conspire, premeditated in the greatest mass murder of man in history. Impeachment and recall vote should proceed if they do not resign. I suggest the people to never vote for these men and woman, and their immediate family members, must be scrutinized carefully if they voiced similar appeals for abortion, for public office ever, as a dire warning.


I hope our country will be restored, return to our nation’s foundational spirit and principles. That some or all of these guidelines would be taken to heart, to usher in a  better tomorrow. I hope everyone the best. http://www.christjustified.com/TheGovernmentRespectinganEstablishment.pdf


Federal Law: Lifetime Marriage

Section One: Lifetime marriage will be recognized after or before a filed marriage certificate, public ceremony, states a man and a woman has or will become one in the same flesh, sexual intercourse, married.

Section Two: Promotion of abstinence, public ceremony and filed marriage forms are necessary for order and peace, but not following through must not justify gov’t to exploit these lifetime marriages by labeling them as only teen sex or adult sex, distribution of condoms in schools, and abortion killing. These unregistered lifetime marriages need recognition, responsibility, and perseverance for our country’s sake.

Federal law: Seven Year Youthful Marriage Law


Section One: Government will value, respect, compulsory enforce marriage registration for all one flesh (mutually consented sexual intercourse) (particularly virgins) youthful marriages. Government will protect youthful marriages from forces conspiring to separate them.

Wikipedia Most states, however, allow minors below 18 to marry (generally they have to be at least 16 but sometimes lower) with parental and/or judicial consent. 

Some states allow females from 12 years old if she is pregnant to marry with parental and judicial consent in Arizona, California, Colorado and North Carolina.

Arizona: 18, 16 with parental consent, no minimum with approval of a superior court judge and parental consent.[3]

California: 18, no minimum with approval of a superior court judge and parental consent.[4]

Colorado: 18, 16 with parental consent, no minimum with judicial approval and parental consent.[2][5][6]

Indiana: 18, 17 with parental consent, 15 in the case of pregnancy with both parental and judicial consent.[7]

Massachusetts: 18 for first marriage, 14 (male) 12 (female) with parental and judicial consent.[2]

Michigan: 18, 16 with parental consent, 15 and under with parental consent and probate judge approval.

New Hampshire: 18, 14 for males and 13 for females, in cases of "special cause" with parental consent and court permission.

North Carolina: 18, 16 with parental consent, unlimited in case of pregnancy or birth of child with parental consent.

Pennsylvania: 18, 16 with parental consent, 14 in case of pregnancy and with the approval of a Judge of the Orphans Court.

Utah: 18, 16 with parental consent, 15 with court approval and parental consent.[12]

West Virginia: 18, 16 with parental consent, under 16 (unspecified limit) with parental and judicial consent[2][15

Section Two: The government will enact into law, make it compulsory all youthful one flesh marriages (particularly virgins), the legal formality must be performed for civil order in society. For young men and woman between ages 12 (if pregnant even slightly earlier age) to 18. The young man’s and young woman’s parents status in society, income, religion, race, nationality must surely not interfere by penalty of law (jail). 

  1. A young man and woman at the age of twelve years and on, can become a lifetime married partner through unadulterated consenting sexual intercourse. Young men and woman are more then fifty percent responsible for their actions.

  2. Children between eight and twelve years of age are not more then fifty percent responsible, meaning parents are more then fifty percent responsible, children cannot become married.

  3. Parents who verbally encourage young men and woman to marry at twelve years and on, are not relieved of their parental duties.

  4. Parents who force through threats, physical harm, and punishment their twelve year olds and older, for the specific purpose to marry another person by sexual intercourse, will be convicted on the charge of rape, the other person and the parent. Rape is not a marriage.

Section Three: The young man or young woman cannot divorce officially for seven years This to at least make every possible attempt of having the marriage last. Separation is allowed but official divorce to free one legally to marry another won’t be allowed for seven years. However some harden hearts after seven years will marry another. The seven year marriage law would help to hamper them from getting involved in other people’s lives. Especially informing, warning others who want a honorable lifetime marriage from virginity to the grave.

  1. This is to give the most effort to nurture the young couple, to make sure that family and/or so called religious leaders won't interfere with the marriage continuing and flourishing.

  2. To warn peers from interfering, disrupting, or destroying the marriage, seeing they are married. 

  3. To allow peers who may have had a romantic interest with one of them, to know that they are now married and unavailable, so to allow faster recovery of a broken heart, and can find someone they can marry.

  4. To encourage other teenage couples to come forward to register their marriage had occurred.

Section Four: For after seven years they can remarry officially. Why? There will always be people who will not submit to marriage for a lifetime, and as Moses allowed remarriage, not that he was someway justifying the action, but understanding there are many harden hearts that cannot ever be persuaded, that so, he allowed remarriage, which I propose after seven years, then it's up to the young couple to decide their paths. However to promote the general welfare of the community, for seven years they must be given the best environment, that their marriage will continue and flourish. If government gives into a few disgruntled parents, not wanting their daughter or son to marry someone due to financial reasons, opposite religious feuds, racial prejudice, etc., and government not recognizing the marriage had occurred at mutual consenting sexual intercourse and not holding the couple accountable to each other, then the flood gates are open and the end result is the current situation today; millions of conceived babies that are slaughtered in premeditated, slow torture, killing, murder, disguised by the label, abortion.



Section Five: Seduction of a young woman or man will be a crime.

  1. Seduction in the third degree will be when the older person is above 18 years old, and three years older then the younger man or woman who is between the ages of twelve to seventeen. The seducer can be sentence up to one year in jail.

  2. Seduction in the second degree will be when the older person is above 18 years old, and four years older then the younger man or woman who is between the ages of twelve to seventeen. The seducer can be sentence up to two years in jail.

  3. Seduction in the first degree will be when the older person is above 18 years old, and five years older then the younger man or woman who is between the ages of twelve to seventeen. The seducer can be sentence up to five years in jail.

  4. However seduction, if it is unadulterated and consenting by the young man and woman is a lifetime marriage. (still doesn't relieve one of criminal consequences)

Foot note: The judge needs to weigh carefully each situation, to determine if a marriage, and the husband is showing responsible, obligation in his love, adoration, care, making the marriage official, there will be no criminal consequences, if however there is a lack of these actions is demonstrated by the husband, or if it is adulterated, meaning the man is already married or polygamist, then their must be criminal consequences, and uniformly given across race, wealth or poor, religion, etc.) but not exceeding five years for each individual person involved with the max 20 years imprisonment.


Footnote: I wrote this section "accountability young men and woman" to replace the idiotic statutory rape laws that has absolutely no support in the bible, is absolutely not rape, when their is consent. I gather the so called statutory rape laws, which are a mishmash of laws, different form each state, were made recently in law, is a power grab, to make young men and young woman out to be children, not responsible, obligated to their actions, for if they are considered as children, it will continue the monopoly of the government school teacher bureaucracy. They increase their numbers of teachers, when decades ago increase the age from 16 years old to 18 years compulsory schooling. This gave the larger bureaucracy a stronger hold, monopoly of power, more leverage, had more teachers in the government. Add the recent addition, the field of Psychology in the fray, you have a bloated big government, secular religion. The field of Psychology, combined with a monopoly of so called teachers, working hand and hand, dismantled through their brain washing through the decades, the biblical understanding in the citizens who recognized marriage occurred at the moment of one flesh, mutual consented sexual intercourse taught from genesis, Moses and Jesus, supported in the countryside in our age by shot gun marriages.