By John Jerome Nowak
   

Childern & Elderly Rights Last Appeal to the People
Woman of Justice - wasn't to much to ask?

     Lets say there was a woman who married a man, not aware of his past. Into the third to fourth year of the relationship, she was violently kicked from behind by him. However she still loved him. He then put her to work on his houses, on an assembly line, in steel warehouses, and other industrial work sites. He intimidated her thorough kicking her again from behind, and other extreme acts of intimidation, to frighten her. She precived that her life can be taken by him, at any moment. Then after years, of enslavement, she at least grew strong enough to stand up to his intimidation. Soon he wanted to divorce her, throw her to curb, thinking he don't have to continue to share the small amount of all the profits through the years of her enslavement she gave him. He wanted all the profits to himself, and give her none. However she was able to get the matter before a judge, not so obliging to her just cause, even so was able to plead to him the evidence. Where the judge ruled in her favor, she was to receive at least some minimal housing, from all her years of toil, enslavement and extreme violence.

    Years past by, and she notice promises giving to love ones by the man who enslaved her, being broken. One particular promise repeated through the long years, was given to a love one, who had put large sum of money in a house, which he ruthlessly took from her. A promise even going back to when she was before the judge, pleaded her case againest the same man that enslaved her, were all being broken by him. She (previously enslaved by him) was ask by him to go along with his broken promises, to share in the unjust gain. Instead of going along with him, she protested to him, pleading it is very unwise of him to go down this path, he didn't listen. He figured afterwords to again intimidate her and then finally treat her ruthlessly to take away even her minimal housing form her. She thought to herself, at least some minimal housing for the years of enslavement, wasn't to much to ask?

    Even so he took her to court, where she came prepared. She had written down 18 pages of evidence of the enslavement, information about the earlier judge decision in the matter and other ruthless acts done to love ones by him. So the judge can make an informed, and just decision. Instead of the judge reading the testimony, he began smirking, then seemingly implied a government psychologist, a seemingly convenient way out of the matter in his mind. He then hasty ruled in favor of her previous slave owner, to take away from her, the minimal housing, she thought to herself wasn't to much to ask? However she was a wise woman, happen to be prepared for this reaction by the judge, and ask to speak. She gave the judge a sealed large yellow evelope, then spoke the evidence of a researcher, as to the so called field of psychology, isn't a true science of laws, is bias, and faddish. Psychology being so, by implication unconstitutional, implying it has undermined her case. The judge tried to stop her speaking, but all attempts failed, she continued with the help of her lawyer, pleading on behalf of her. The judge didn't listen to her wise words, and the implication of them. The judge dismiss the session of court, not saying a word to the woman, after taking from her, the minimal housing she thought to herself within, for the years of enslavement, and extreme violence, wasn't to much to ask?  Would you aid her, in seeking justice for herself and her love ones, if she was to ask you?

    Hello, my name is John Jerome Nowak, I will present a short version, for people to grasp the elements. I was enslaved in my youth, working on houses, on an assembly line, in steel warehouses, and other industrial work sites; not by physical chains, but mental chains, links in intimidation, and extreme violence. In thinking of reporting my parents to the authorities, I made a threat to my Mom, 'I would report you', but then became fearful I would be forced into government created psychology. I feared would destroy my religious character and content, slowly growing in me. When enslaved, at around 12 years old, my parents made a promise, an agreement with me (perhaps because I had threaten I would report them). Even if I had no say in the promise, it was still a promise. The promise was I would have something when older. When older, I perceived my parents would take back their agreements, promises. Around 24 years old, I was able to get them in a court of law in 1991, and the judge ruled in my favor, at least I received some minimal housing.

    A year previous to this time I found evidence in my research at some libraries, psychology falsely portrayed as a science. Even though they may use some scientific instruments and data gathering, their results, can't be replicated, due to human behavior is so sensitive to incidental sources of stimulation, isn't a true science of laws, but fraudulent, bias, faddish.  I had written in 1995, the rudiments of the world, psychology, is base on a lesser time span and a narrow rudimentary observation of the culture, a foundation of sifting sand, resulting in faddish and bias conclusions against religion and people of it's morality.

    Fast forward to 2010, my Dad has begun taking back agreements again, from my older sister, aunt Mary, nieces, worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and began to take back again, his agreement that I will have something when older. My dad took me to court to evict me, on April 20, 2010 before judge Louis P. Violanti in Lackawanna NY, taking back his agreement with the judge Norman F. Walawender that ruled in my favor in 1991, some minimal housing, based on being enslaved by him in my youth. While in court my lawyer hand delivered 18 pages of evidence of these events in my past, included within, my dad's recent actions of ruthlessness toward love ones. The judge didn't read the testimony. He seemingly implied a psychologist and ruled hasty in my dad's favor. I sensed this case, by the judges actions and words, was escalated to a new level. That being the unconstitutional influence of state sponsored psychology in the law courts. Where I sense that when judges want an easy convenient way out of difficult cases they toss them up to psychology one way or another.  

    I spoke up in court, I asked to say a statement, and was permitted to speak a statement. The brief statement was describing the events at 12 years old, how I came to the reasoning not to call the authorities on my parents, due to being wisely fearful of government psychology. Then I spoke the evidence, I found in 1990, my research proving psychology, isn't a true science of laws, bias and faddish. The judged attempted to stop me from speaking the evidence twice, but my lawyer insisted with a statement, while raising his hand to the judge.  I was able to finish speaking the brief statement in a court, while in session. If you continue to read, you will read the next level of details, including additional evidence, presenting a case, the unconstitutional influence of state sponsored psychology. Conclusion, since psycholgy is not a true science of laws, bias and faddish, thereby fitting the definition of the supreme court ruling' in the conscientious - objector case, can be reasonably concluded is a secular religion. Thereby psychology, can be concluded (with additional evidence provided), is undermining the courts and all elections.

    This sums up the highlights of a unique eviction case April 20, 2010, before the judge Louis P. Violanti in Lackawanna NY, pertaining to going back to my child hood. Where there was slave labor, child abuse, extreme violence at the hands of my parents, particularly Ralph Nowak.  I don't hate my Dad, nor do I want others to hate my Dad. I want people to see the evidence.

    The judge Louis P. Violanti is seated to hold my Dad accountable, the eviction case April 25, 2010 was in his court, paid by Lackawanna citizens taxes, he had the testimony, to read. I appeal to all citizens of  Lackawanna, as a fellow citizen for 44 years, I appeal to all citizens of western New york, state of new york, the united states of America, all citizens of the world, to hold the judge Louis P. Vianti accountable, to hold Ralph Nowak accountable.

1. The judge didn't read my 18 page testimony handed to him (preceding the court session so he may read)  by my lawyer, the record of proceedings would bare this out.
2. The judge maligned my character, by suggesting a state psychologist (perhaps I misheard, perhaps implied, court recordings will bare the truth), the judge smirking (I do not hate the judge, nor would I want anyone else to hate the judge). When asked of me to briefly say what is in the letter (he didn't read, I had provided) I tried to accommodate the judge, but could not give justice to the letter's contents, the judge cut me off.
3. The judge Louis P. Violanti made a hasty decision, thinking by mere appearances this was a routine case, a son after 18 years old, a father has the right not to support his son. Contrary, written in my testimony I provided the court (if the judge had read), will bare out, this is far from such a case. In the written testimony, is written a case of force labor, enslavement by violent means, against ones will, under duress and force by the hands of Ralph Nowak and Eleanor Nowak, was given to John Jerome Nowak a verbal agreement. We are working so much, so we have something when older, at around 12 years old. Written in the testimony, my Dad was before a judge Norman F. Walawender in 1991, decided in my favor. Ralph Nowak was to take better care of me. I won my care, wages due me, I was content with the arrangement. Written in the testimony, since 1991, and until recently, I presented a pattern of behavior in Ralph Nowak, begun again to violate long standing agreements.

  

    There was an earlier court hearing in 1991, which I had hoped resolved the matter, the Judge Norman F. Walawender ruled in my favor. I gathered there was a verbal agreement between my parents and the judge Norman F. Walawender based upon the written testimony I provided the judge in 1991. My written testimony at the time, contained a summary of my parent's statement, a promise, agreement by my parents given to me under duress at 12 years old, "we were made to work so we would have something when we were older" and written testimony of the extreme violence inflicted upon me.  Where today, considering all the details, I perceive the extreme violence, had an effect.

12 years old

1. Around 4 years old on a sidewalk, he kicked me from behind. I felt a jolt go up the inside of my body, my bones as if colliding in each other, hurled me in the air some, falling forward some on the grass. I realized he could hurt me badly, could kill me in his anger.
2. At about 12 years old, when I reached the doorway of the his steel warehouse office, he kicked me into across the narrow room, about 6 ft, striking the chairs legs, seeing stars, dazed and confused, where I reached as quickly as I could feeling for the chairs legs, pulling myself up, sitting on the chair, so not to be kicked again. My Dad said, don't move from there.
3. Dad came into the house and put a hammer through the T.V., when I was watching with my friend and then made me go to work on the house next store, I was 13 years old.
   
4. The house next store, I was sitting on the roof just near the top of the extended ladder or standing on the ladder, about 25 feet below the the brick walkway. The left of me, in anger Dad flung a hammer. I watched the hammer skip along the roof, passing about two feet from from me, nearing hitting my older brother to the right of me, at the edge on the roof, the hammer falling below to the cement driveway.
5. My dad's steel warehouse, my parents told me (around 16 years old) over the phone to work. I wouldn't. My brother came after me in the warehouse and tried to force me to work. We struggled, wrestled each other for a long time, both ending up outside on the ground for some time, turning dark. He tried to keep me from getting out of his hold.
6. I remember when dad attacked me again. Dad got on top of me and started punching me saying he was going to kill me. He took a  glass astray and smashed it over my head cutting my thumb which served a nerve leaving my thumb without feeling (temporary). I also remember when he once came after me with a knife (mom persuaded him to put the knife down in the kitchen).
   
7. I only remember one time he (Dad) spent individual time with me for any activities then work, after he beat me with a plastic toy base ball bat, for asking him so many times to take me fishing. We fished for a two hours, and returned. Two hours of individual time is all he gave, that I remember all my youth.
   

    Intimidation and fear factor combined with my parents other statements in the written testimony in 1991, said to me early at the time of my youth “what ever we do, no matter right or wrong, we are always right”,“all children are good for is work” and another statement not in the written testimony in 1991, but also recall "you can't be friends with your children" created a form of enslavement, in my early years of life. You can simple remove the words children and add the words slave or slaves in the sentences, you may get the picture.

    Since the 1991 court case, according to the judge's ruling, receive some minimum housing, additional evidence, never once paying rent. I helped out with the utilities, paying the electric and water, from time to time the heating, bought my own food and my parent's had a more caring spirit. My parents would visit for a few weeks in the spring and fall, on their yearly track between their houses, Canada to Florida.

    Why the broken verbal agreements? One factor my Mom's recent stroke, without my Mom controlling all the finances, combined with other factors, my Dad has reverted back to his old ways, and became intimidating and ruthless again. Facilitated by my youngest sister Betty Pelc owner of Advantage Trim and Lumber (please boycott this business) ending long held verbal agreements. While Ralph Nowak owning an Island & houses in Canada, house in Florida, houses, warehouse and land in New York State, combined total aprox 2,000,000 dollars.

1. Particularly began in the spring of 2010, towards his older daughter, Ralph Nowak ruthlessly breaking a verbal agreement for 17 to 15 years said multiple times, stealing from her 95,000.
2. My aunt Mary 90 years old (aprox 220,000 switch to his banking account), Ralph Nowak ruthlessly breaking a verbal agreement of quality care, by refusing to allow her to open a banking account, through intimidation and elderly emotional abuse.
3. Ralph Nowak ending his agreement with the Judge Norman F. Walawender in 1991 to take better care of me and his children.
   
4. Where I believe it reached a point, my 90 year old aunt's life is in danger, either due to poor care, or Ralph Nowak's recent statement, told me by a relative, if my mom dies "I will blow my head off". She should not be entrusted in his care.

    Where after the judge Louis P. Violanti ruled in Ralph Nowak's favor, without reading my testimony, also including about the intimidation, abuse and one's life in danger, of my aunt Mary, I submit the judge Louis P. Violanti made a hasty ruling.

1. On the day of my eviction, I had to be out of the house, in broad day light there was shown  ruthlessness towards his older daughter's children. I saw two large trailer loads of belongings assuming they were going to taken to a storage facility, by law, even so it seemed strange, being I didn't hear of an eviction notice for my niece. Without even an eviction notice from Ralph Nowak I been told, was destroyed all my niece's personal belongings, government certificates and baby pictures of her and her two year old daughter, and paintings of her by my Mom, in a land fill, through Betty Pelc's father in Law. The police were called, Betty Pelc's father in Law  even admitted in front of the police I been told, to the taking the items to the transfer station (taken immediately to the landfill), there was no arrest, that I'm aware.
2. Then recently attempting to break another verbal agreement with my other older niece when she helped him, until he left to florida (which I advised her she shouldn't, he is just playing for time, however she had a more gentle spirit towards my aunt's care, warning her he will turn on her), now Ralph Nowak is demanding money from her, in a letter from his lawyer. (update small victory, as of July 16, their ruthless demands for money, has been withdrawn)
   

    Ralph Nowak has ruthlessly broke verbal agreements, time and time again, stealing money, people's lives, child hoods, hoarding other peoples money, in the bible this is called covetousness in some renderings or simple greed.

I Corintihians 10:6 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

James 5:1-6 Come now, you rich, weep and howl for your miseries which are coming upon you. Your riches have rotted and your garments have become moth-eaten. Your gold and your silver have rusted; and their rust will be a witness against you and will consume your flesh like fire. It is in the last days that you have stored up your treasure! Behold, the pay of the laborers who mowed your fields, and which has been withheld by you, cries out against you; and the outcry of those who did the harvesting has reached the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth. You have lived luxuriously on the earth and led a life of wanton pleasure; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter. You have condemned and put to death the righteous man; he does not resist you.

    I had tried to inform them, so they may change course, but seemingly no change of mind or actions seen in them. I wonder if it had to get this far, but seeing others hurt, especially my older sister and 90 year old aunt, cause me to have to bring this to the attention of others.

Unjust Respect Towards the so Called Scientific Field of Psychology

    In the bible "respect of persons" is when a judge or anyone, unjustly sides with someone based upon their standing, poor, mighty or wealthy, in their community, society.

    After the judge Louis P. Violanti ruled, I submit in haste Ralph Nowak's favor, you will also notice a statement I spoke, under verbal affirmation to tell the truth, while court is in session, where I presented, spoke the evidence, the so called scientific field of Psychology is fraudulent, having faddish and biased qualities, not able to replicate their findings. Where the so called scientific field of Psychology has evolved into using science as a front, to pretend it's scientific, to receive indirectly and directly trillions of government tax dollars (main factor our country is broke, besides the immediate cost, the consequential cost) of unconstitutional influence upon the people. Spoke these words before the judge  Louis P. Violanti in a court of law.

----------------------------- Beginning ---------------------------------

Unconstitutionality
Forcing People into Government Psychology

    The reason I did not come forward at 12 years old, calling the authorities on my parents, for making their children work in the their factories and houses. I didn't want to be force into government psychology, which I feared would destroy my religious content, character, which was being slowly developed in me.

(Addition details, facts to understand what had happen, left out to make the statment brief = At around 12 years old, working on the assembly line of the soap company, I wondered if I should call the authorities on my parents, for making their children work in their companies. I wondered about children working, is it right? I figure to some degree it's ok, especially when families really needed the money, if they were poor. I figured they weren't poor. I decided to threaten my mom at work one day. Standing by the soap hopper. I said, I'm going to report you to the authorities for making us children work so much. She was somewhat angry, and may of answered back in a mocking, daring way. I worried the authorities may take away our parents from us. Causing even more hardship for us? I briefly mentally visualize, near the end of the assembly line, government represented by a man in a white smock type uniform. I sense, the government over reaching in various ways, especially into religious concerns, sense immediately danger. I quickly stopped my visual. I figured it wasn't worth calling the authorities.)

In later years I slowly began to become aware by more human behavior observation, and observing human behavior in the bible, the unconstitutionality, government forcing people into government psychology. I researched and found evidence of the unscientific claims of psychology. With the experience (click link to understand) I gain from being before a Judge in 1991, forced into an establishment of psychology, be it government or private. Where I was by then mature enough in my religious content and character, to over come their unconstitutional assault upon my mental thinking, mental disposition. Instead, it pleased the court, a minister provided the counseling instead of the state. I soon began my writing.

    I wrote in 1995, the rudiments of the world, psychology, is base on a lesser time span and a narrow rudimentary observation of the culture, a foundation of sifting sand, resulting in faddish and bias conclusions against religion and people of it's morality.

Seymour Epstein, University of Massachusetts- Amherst

“Psychology claims to be scientific having a high degree of control and objectivity. However, there is no more fundamental requirement in science then that the replicability of findings be established. Since experiments in the physical sciences produce results that are replicable and generalizable, it seemed reasonable to them, the same was true for psychology. Laboratory experiments actually are ineffective because much human behavior is so sensitive to incidental sources of stimulation, that adequate control wouldn’t be achieved, even at attempts of exact replication. As for objectivity and full disclosure in psychology, few replication studies are attempted. Replication studies are particularly apt to be rejected for publishing, when they cast doubt on psychologies accepted conclusions. Some journals state that they do not accept replication studies; others implicitly follow a similar policy.”

------------------------ end -------------------------

    I presented evidence, from a researcher in psychology, that he made observations about the field of psychology, saying it hasn't the scientific replication, as with a true science of laws, then he goes on to say it isn't objective as a true science of laws, being he observed much bias, and faddish observations. I'm paraphrasing his observations, for easier understanding.

    Basically I'm trying to say my case, was undermined, by the unconstitutional influence of government prop up psychology by trillions of direct and indirect tax dollars, as a so called true science of laws, in society, and especially in the government institutions. Instead of the judge giving me the benefit of the doubt, looking in to the matters carefully, at least reading the full testimony, evidence, he suggested or perhaps implied a psychologist, he ruled in haste. After he ruled, I ask to make a statement to the judge, to show evidence his seemingly mental thinking predisposition, seemingly based on psychology prop up by the state, is not a true science of laws, which psychology has been parading it self as a true science of laws, since it's conception.

Evidence the Government Prop Up Psychology Isn't Constitutional

     Our founding fathers when written the constitution in 1787, had little if  any clue, government will someday be a respecter of philosophy and especially psychology in the vast government university and education system, the impact, powerful overwhelming influence on society, government institutions and especially future elections.

• Being the first government university institution wasn't established until 1801. All universities up until 1801 were of private citizenry. Yale, Princeton, many of religious grass roots, naturally of the people, by the people, for the people. A naturally, constitutional influence upon the people.
• Being especially wasn't until around 1879, after all the fouding fathers had died, the so called field of Psychology began in German universities, acclaimed by the so called intelligentsia as a so called science. Which the evidence above, shows it to be fraudulent, having faddish and biased qualities, not able to replicate their findings.

    Psycology began to take root and through the governemnt respect, unaturally, unconstitutional overwhemed through it's influence the delicate balance among the electorate vote. This had also occured previously, for hundreds of years when the state had respected an establishment of religion. Governemnt prop up in all the government institutions, in Europe. The State empowered the Catholic establishment, with the title the one and only true Christianity, over all others claiming Christianity in Europe, which caused great injustices and harm through out the land.

    The same has happen in the 20th century the government institutions in the USA, has respected, prop up an establishment of philosophy and particularly a so called in name only scientific field of psychology. Gave psychology an equivalent title the one and only true “EXPERT in human behavior”, over all other human behavior groups. When the so called field of the Psychology is not a true science of laws, even casually spoke of, even by their own.

    Government psychology especially in the hundreds of campus universities spread out across the country,  unconstitutionally promulgating an electorate to vote for it's dogmas and causes into government policy. Today, government universities are in every state in the U.S., some having several, their influence in society and votes is tremendous, overwhelming the the equilibrium in a fair contest, called an election, where power was invested by the founding fathers in the people, to naturally concure, and make policy through representation. Not by government taking sides in the matter, through respecting one particular group's members, causes and beliefs, by setting them up in Government institutions across the land.

“California has approximately 36 state universities, 110 community colleges.

    Government universities are as large cities of architectural grand design, as the temples of ancient Egypt, as multiple colossal mega churches on one campus, as multiple Vaticans across the nation, containing so called experts, as if priest in psychology and philosophy, costing trillions of tax dollars, to memorize, redirect and hold fast millions of particular young citizens mindsets, towards the dogmas and goals in philosophy and psychology.

     Due to the governemnt unconstituionally respecting psychology, government has established psycholgies teachings, beliefs as a relgion in many of the people. The supreme court ruling, describes a secular religion as "sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God."

    In the conscientious - objector case, the Supreme court defined a religious belief as a “sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God of those admittedly qualifying for exemption” The court later expanded the definition to include ethical and moral beliefs that assumed the function of a religion in the registrant’s life. - Hans Tirpak

“among religions in this country which do not teach…. A belief in the existence of God…[are] Buddhism, Ethical Culture, secular Humanism, and others.”
 

See Torcaso v. Watkins, 397 U.S. 488, 495, n.ll (1961)

    My contention, appeal is the so called field of psychology is an other, a secular religion, not a true science of laws.

Constitution of the United States of America
1st Amendment

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Therefore

    Psychology has unconstitutionally been made into a state, national secular religion in the government institutions. Which this state, national secular religion violates, makes void the primary establishment clause in the constitution.

• Which is used to intimidate people, from speaking out, seeking justice.
• Where testimonial evidence is seemingly deemed to inconvenient to be read by a judge.
• Where unconstitutionally forcing citizens before the court and government agencies, into psychology against their will.
• Professors, teachers of psychology and philosophy have become as the nations priest to indoctrinate, dictate, program directly and indirectly their students (disciples), influencing unconstitutionally votes, causing the sensitive gage, the ballot box, elections to display faulty readings, especially the last forty to sixty years in America and democracies through out the world.

      The title of expert in human behavior, in government institutions, has voided, canceled out the constitution's most acclaimed, primary proclamation. Particularly the spirit (mental disposition), principle behind the constitution's proclamation forbid government to respect an establishment. Be it religion or other form of human behavior group that takes the place of religion.

 

    Based on these evidences, the lackawanna N.Y. court system, courts across the nation and all elections are undermined, by the unconstitutional government respect given to the establishment of psychology and philosophy. Causing great injustices across the land, greatly harming and in dangering love ones.

    June 14, 2010 One more thing, I can't help noticing the similarities of 2005, when I began to write my book, observing the destruction of New Orleans. Now that I have place much of the book online here. I see perhaps similar events happening in the gulf coast. I have said this to a few friends recently, since it cause alarm in me to verbally communicate this, recently. I think it is wise, prudent to now let others be informed. It has not escape my notice, that my Dad's actions of intimidation and ruthlessness, has coincided with he blow out of the oil well at the bottom of the ocean. I''m aware God works in mysterious ways, to have his will accomplished. My Dad has moved to the Florida gulf coast, from what I heard it seemed to be on the shoreline, or near. So I wondered what may happen, thinking of the scenarios, of perhaps the near future when the hurricane may well up in the gulf coast, when it reaches the shore. I can think of a few scenarios, one perhaps it may clean the water, if with the right wind direction. Perhaps do very little to the oil, or perhaps it may pick up the oil, dispersed it on everything in it's path inland, then if one spark from perhaps a electric line, or a thunder bolt ignites the oil, fire will perhaps quickly spread by the hurricane winds, causing perhaps a whirlwind of fire, where it's own heat will begin pull in the available oxygen from the surrounding land, the fire creating it's own hurricane wind speeds, causing devastation the United States has never known before. Then there is the remotest possibility the oil, suspended in the ocean layers, will be drawn up on the surface, then drawn up in the atmosphere, be ignited and become a hurricane of fire (June 24,2010 perhaps a catastrophic explosion similar to a gain elevator explosion effect).  I hope not. If there was only one scientist out of thousands said this is possible, well I would lean on the safe side and would advised the government to also take the precautionary steps.
    If there is a remote chance this will happen. If I was in charge, the prudent solution, I would begin immediately to set in motion, evacuation plans, for 24 hour complete evacuation of all citizens, included all government personnel, from any 500 by 500 mile area, that means perhaps the whole state of Florida, or perhaps the whole golf coast 500 miles inland, using a fleet of buses, set in strategic places. Because of the area that has to be evacuated, at a certain time, the window of opportunity closes, all cars and belongings must be left behind by immediate maximum force of law, to not take the chance of clogging the road ways hampering the evacuation. This for the first hurricane of the season. To at least see what may occur.
    For I fear, perhaps God may not hold his wrath much longer, being there are over 50,000,000 innocent dead babies crying out for justice, in the USA alone, through the slow water torture, killing, murdering of babies in abortion. Which I presented a case, in my article title "Government respecting an establishment" Psychology is a major factor involved. God will judge this land one way or another. The danger may dissipate, there may again be some time for america to turn around. If america doesn't, and God does finally judge it will be swift and catch people off guard.
     I am not a prophet, I am only trying to be a righteous man, trying my best to be a servant to God.